X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTP id 1605094 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:01:06 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.29; envelope-from=steve@stevet.net Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061126220042.FQUC5575.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:00:42 -0500 Received: from [192.168.2.203] ([68.6.58.190]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id ra0q1V00l46FLUs0000000; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:00:50 -0500 Resent-Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:00:41 -0800 Message-Id: <3F9FAE53-3596-4B57-88AC-4EA26D3E8059@stevet.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-To: Rotary motors in aircraft From: Steve Thomas Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: metric system Resent-From: Steve Thomas Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:12:04 -0800 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) I don't get it. All measurement systems are arbitrary. The "English" system certainly came from some odd roots. But so did the railroad track gauge (it was the width of a horse drawn wagon track.) And guess what else? The Space Shuttle booster rockets were designed around the same gauge so it could be shipped to its final destination. The metric system was designed around what they thought was the circumference of the earth. They got it wrong. And, 1 cc is not the same as 1 ml., though that was the intent. Now, all measurements are based on a metal rod, or other device, residing in a refrigerator at a constant temperature in the National Weights and Measures office for the US and somewhere in France for metric measurements. OK, the SAE system may be a little convoluted, but once you learn it, it works just fine. Oh, I forgot, we should change just because the Europeans use it. Should we also adopt soccer as our national pastime just because the "rest of the world" sees soccer as their national pastime? I mean, almost no one adopts our version of football. Just because "they" do it is not an a-priori reason do to so. Will we eventually migrate over to metric de-facto even though we have rejected a de-juris solution? Maybe. But in the interim, SAE works just fine, and in the absence of a compelling economic reason to do so, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Best Regards, Steve ____________________________________________________________________ On Nov 25, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Bulent Aliev wrote: >> I just think it is embarrassing that the US cant seem to adopt the >> international system...