|
Hi Bill,
I'm assuming you are trying to deal with single-point failure modes... Considering each circuit you named, you've already got your redundancy with the coils, just wire each coil to its own breaker. Loss of a single coil should still allow the engine to keep running, albeit at a slightly reduced power level. As for the pumps, most of them allow flow through, so put a pair of them in-line and power each separately. This keeps you from having to over-complicate the fuel path with check valves and selectors, while giving you the electrical redundancy you seek. As for the injectors, unless you install a second set on your intake and make them switchable for their driver input, you're probably stuck with a single point issue there.
<Marv>
Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@allvantage.com> wrote:
OK, This is my fall back position. I have posed this question on the
Aerolectric list for a couple of days and no answer. (although the email did
get caught up in an embarrasing event!) 90% of you guys have already wired
your planes and followed Bob N's advice, so how did you do the redundancy on
the fuel pumps, coils, and injectors?
from the AE list:
"I am installing a fuel injected Mazda rotary engine and trying to follow
the Z-19 guidelines for dual battery, single alternator. Looking at the
engine primary and secondary circuit, I need to install a primary and
secondary fuel pump, plus I want to power the coils and the injectors
off of the battery buss.
How should I do this? I suppose I could take the fuel pump diode output
and switch it to either of the two fuel pumps???
What about the coils and injectors? Should I set up similar circuits
for them, or is there a better way to reduce parts???
I would appreciate any guidance you guys could give me.
Thanks and Happy Thanksgiving!
Bill B
--
Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
|
|