X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.2) with ESMTP id 1547958 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 09:09:02 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.70; envelope-from=rusty@radrotary.com Received: from ibm65aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061109140834.JVGU11953.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm65aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:08:34 -0500 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm65aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20061109140826.EJHW1657.ibm65aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:08:26 -0500 From: "Russell Duffy" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: P Porting template? Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 08:08:23 -0600 Message-ID: <005601c70408$87536ef0$6e01a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0057_01C703D6.3CB8FEF0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C703D6.3CB8FEF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So my viewpoint is anybody who wants to experiment with "P" ports should = be encouraged to do so - we all learn from experimentation - but, its not necessary if your objective is producing 160-170 HP. Ed=20 =20 Couldn't agree more Ed. I still find PPorts interesting, and have some = used housings to play with, so it's definitely on my "one of these days" list = of things I want to try. If you're looking for a power level that can be reached by either PPorts or side ports, the side port road will be much easier to travel. =20 =20 Cheers, Rusty (DAR inspection 11th, first flight 12th or 18th, bankruptcy after filling up with 100LL) =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C703D6.3CB8FEF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
So my viewpoint is anybody who wants to = experiment with=20 "P" ports should be encouraged to do so - we all learn from = experimentation -=20 but, its not necessary if your objective is producing 160-170 = HP.
Ed 
 
Couldn't=20 agree more Ed.  I still find PPorts interesting, and have = some used=20 housings to play with, so it's definitely on my "one of these days" list = of=20 things I want to try.   If you're looking for a power = level that=20 can be reached by either PPorts or side ports, the side port road will = be much=20 easier to travel. 
 
Cheers,
Rusty (DAR=20 inspection 11th, first flight 12th or 18th, bankruptcy after filling up = with=20 100LL)
 
 <= /DIV> ------=_NextPart_000_0057_01C703D6.3CB8FEF0--