Thanks Tracy. One more question: I'm using the
wiring harness from the Renesis. The harness for the coils has the power
wires going to pin C tied together and grounded through a capacitor which is
marked 250/0.47. I plan to use the same set-up and presume the capacitor
is used to catch spikes as the coils are turned on and off. Do you
recommend using this or not?
Thanks again. Will wait to hear from
you.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:06
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Coil / EC2
Wiring
Keep in mind that there are entire books written on the subject of
aircraft wiring so this will not be an exhaustive answer and there are always
situations which I won't think of until something goes wrong (like Al's
situation with the remote EM2 display and the EC2 PCM wiring).
The only shielded wire in my system is the alternator cable to the
battery (mainly for radio noise suppression) so extensive use of shielded
wires is usually not required. I did use a twisted pair for the crank
angle sensor on the Renesis.
Here is the general guideline on the EC2 wire routing outlined in
the EC2 installation guide that I should go back and expand on, clarify,
etc.
Route the low level control lines (PCM, crank
sensor, coil control lines, etc) separately from any high current switching
lines (coil power, coil ground, injector power & drive lines,
etc).
That's it. As stated above, there will always be possible
exceptions like Al's situation but 99% of the time this general rule will work
fine.
Tracy (back to getting the 20B setup to run for the Rotary
fly-in)
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 8:35
AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Coil Wiring
Tracy, I have both my harneses (EC &EM-2) soldered up
and ready to be routed. I would like to do this once and
correctly...:>)
I have two firewall penetrations, one on the pilot
side going to the injectors with the injector control wires bundled
together. I had planned to bring the injector power wires thru this
same penetration bundled together, but not bundled with the control
wires. If I need to do any twisted pairs, exactly which pairs
should be twisted together?? How far apart should the two bundles
be?
The other firewall penetration is on the copilot side. I
currently have the balance of the EC-2 wires bundled together and going
thru this penetration. I also have all the EM-2 wires bundled and
going thru this same penetration. This includes therrocouple and
temperature sensor wires. Sounds like I need to separate some
wires. If so which wires need to be separated and how?
Do I need more penetrations? Exactly which wires need to be twisted
together and or shielded?? How far apart should the bundles be and
if they are together (penetrations) how far can they be allowed to be
close?
Thanks, Bill Bradburry
Mark;
Tracy;
I'd like to explore this further. Mark S
wrote:
After reading Bob Darrah's post last week where he noticed a
big improvement after separating the leads to his coils I gave it a try
on my 20B. It made a big difference, but was most noticeable in the
lower rpm range. I was only able to separate the wires down near
the coils, and then only by a small amount, but it made a substantial
improvement. My question for Tracy is, can I leave the grounds and +14v
wires bundled together and only separate the trigger leads, or do I need
to separate all the wires? Also, if I were to use 3 individual
shielded wires and ground the shields, could I then bundle the trigger
leads together with the rest of the coil wires?
On a side
note, after separating the coil leads, it took a much leaner mixture to
get it to run smooth. Before, the best it would idle was about
1200rpm, now it will idle nicely at 900 rpm, not that I want to do that,
but it shows that the improvement isn't all in my
head.
Clarify for me which leads you separated; the control
leads from pins 3, 20, and 21 (C-pins) from each other? I find that
below about 1400-1500 rpm the engine begins the occasional miss, and gets
progressively rougher as rpm decreases. I've been thinking that it
seemed more ignition related then mixture related.
I have
the C-pin leads and the B-pins ground bundled together from the box to
the firewall penetration (a few feet). These bundles are separate for
each set of coils (lead, trail). From the firewall to coils (a
few more feet) the power lead (pin-D) joins the bundle. The A-pins are
all grounded at the coil mount.
Tracy
wrote:
1. How long is the wiring harness between EC2 and
coils?
About 6 ft for the trailing and 10 ft for the
leading.
2. How is the power ground to the coils (A
terminals) routed? (hopefully not in the same harness, if so, there is
your problem).
3. Same question as 2. on the power
terminals.
Does this say that the power lead (D-pins) should not be
bundled with the C or B pin leads? If so, is this just as true if
the lead and trailing bundles are separate.
4. I would be
surprised if this turned out to be the problem but if coupling between
the control lines themselves (C pins) turns out to be the problem,
use either twisted pairs or shielded wires to drive the B & C lines
to each coil. I would lean toward twisted pairs.
I ran a common
B-pin ground for each set; bundled with the C-pin leads but not
twisted. Twisted pairs would mean adding more wires - or
would twisting 3 control leads with one ground to as
well?
5. Are there any other lines routed along with
the coil harness (injector drives, etc)?
The coil bundles run with
the injector drive bundles from the near the firewall to the top of the
engine, maybe 4 ft or so; and run with other wires for a foot or
so. One objective is to minimize firewall penetrations, another is
to maintain separation between sets of injectors and sets of coils for
true redundancy, and another is to separate noisy wires from quiet wires;
so further separating isn't a simple
matter.
Al
-- Homepage:
http://www.flyrotary.com/ Archive
and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/
|