Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #33732
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Pressure Regulator Vacuum or Boost??
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:02:54 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Thanks, Al.  I was not certain that the EC2 was set up for a manifold referenced regulator - but, I suspected it was especially seeing that the default MAP settings at idle always turned out to be too rich for my engine.   My fault for  assuming that "Boost referenced" meant also "vacuum referenced".
 
So that completes the equation.  The EC2 is manifold referenced so for best fuel control the pressure regulator should be "vacuum referenced".  Boost referenced also if you have forced induction.
 
Ed
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Al Gietzen
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:14 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Pressure Regulator Vacuum or Boost??

Ed;

 

I started with a fixed pressure regulator at 42-43#, which would normally be fine for NA.  When I was having trouble getting the engine to idle right with Tracy’s EC2; he mentioned that his programming was set up assuming a manifold pressure referenced regulator.  TWM was kind enough to trade me straight across for one that was pressure referenced – pressure at idle now is low 30’s, and it helped getting good idle.

 

I guess “boost referenced” means just that; for MAP above normal atmospheric.

 

Al

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ed Anderson
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 9:58 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Fuel Pressure Regulator Vacuum or Boost??

 

For the entire life of my rotary powered RV-6A, I have flown with a "Boost Referenced" adjustable fuel pressure regulator from MSD.  As you know, it is desirable to keep the pressure differential between the injector fuel rail pressure and the manifold pressure a constant for best fuel injection control. 

 

I flew for several years thinking that since my pressure regulator was manifold reference that it was indeed doing this.  Then the light bulb came on - my fuel pressure holds rock-steady at 43 PSI - and does not vary between idle and WOT!  This certainly implies that the fuel pressure IS NOT varying as a function of manifold pressure.

 

Then doing some recent research on fuel pressure regulators, I noticed that some say they are "Boost Referenced" and other's say "Vacuum/Boost Referenced".   My conclusion (which may be incorrect)  is that while my pressure regulator is "Boost Referenced" it is not "Vacuum Referenced".  The difference (If I understand it correctly ) is that my regulator would increase fuel pressure IF it ever encounter manifold pressure greater than ambient - since I am not used forced induction that never happens - which in turn appears to be the reason I never see the fuel pressure changing in response to manifold "vacuum".

 

So my question to those who realllllllyyyyyy know -  is it correct that for my NA 13B I need a fuel pressure regulator that responses to manifold "Vacuum" or is the difference in description between "vacuum referenced and boost referenced " just semantics in advertising?

 

Thanks

 

Ed

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster