X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [216.211.128.10] (HELO mail-in03.adhost.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.4) with ESMTP id 1413722 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:25:09 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.211.128.10; envelope-from=joeh@pilgrimtech.com Received: from Pilgrim10 (c-67-183-14-47.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.183.14.47]) by mail-in03.adhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C702AE237 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:24:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joeh@pilgrimtech.com) From: "Joe Hull" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Fuel Pressure Regulator Vacuum or Boost?? Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:24:08 -0700 Message-ID: <00ab01c6ddab$210af470$bb02a8c0@redmond.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C6DD70.74AC1C70" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 Thread-Index: Acbdp26DQpj8DMHyQWOYRI4UwflB2gAAxbJg In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C6DD70.74AC1C70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit So my question to those who realllllllyyyyyy know - is it correct that for my NA 13B I need a fuel pressure regulator that responses to manifold "Vacuum" or is the difference in description between "vacuum referenced and boost referenced " just semantics in advertising? As always - I'm not one who reallllly knows and can't answer the question. But, I can add that Dave Atkins told me to just cap the pressure port on my fuel regulator. One of his guys suggested I connect it to the vacuum line and he said "no, it doesn't do anything on an NA setup". I'm using the TWM fuel-pressure regulator. So I guess that follows with your experience of "not doing anything" Joe Hull Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - Rotary 13B NA) Redmond (Seattle), Washington ------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C6DD70.74AC1C70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

So my question to those who realllllllyyyyyy know - = is it correct that for my NA 13B I need a fuel pressure regulator that = responses to manifold "Vacuum" or is the difference in description = between "vacuum referenced and boost referenced " just semantics in advertising?

As always – I’m not one = who reallllly knows and can’t answer the question. But, I can add that = Dave Atkins told me to just cap the pressure port on my fuel regulator. One = of his guys suggested I connect it to the vacuum line and he said “no, it = doesn’t do anything on an NA setup”. I’m using the TWM fuel-pressure regulator. So I guess that follows with your experience of “not = doing anything”

Joe = Hull

Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - Rotary = 13B NA)

Redmond (Seattle), Washington

------=_NextPart_000_00AC_01C6DD70.74AC1C70--