Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #33642
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Flight test
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:02:31 -0700
To: 'Rotary motors in aircraft' <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Flight test

 

Basically the reason for the low rpm numbers while flying level is because the power was pulled back.  MAP was only 19”.  What rpm do you get at 19” MAP?

 

Al, I think that my RPM at that MAP is about 4400 RPM's, but I have a ground adjustable IVO, and I have changed it several times, trying to see what changes I get in climb performance vs cruise.  I have flown quite a bit at 60-65% power, and I get a fuel burn rate of about 7-8 gallons per hour, flying at about 140 kts.  I found that is probably my best "economy" cruise setting.

 

Steve;

My rpm at 19” was about 4450, so that is consistent.  I think the issue is that it was not 65-70% power.  The fuel burn was reading 16-18 gph, (mixture bar on EM2 showing about 2/3 scale) which is translating into the high power readings.  I think I have to change the FF CAL constant.

Tracy – I’ve left the default 151 in for FFCAL.  Prior to running a couple tanks of fuel to calibrate, is there some other good guess for what this should be for a 20B with 500-550 cc/min injectors?  I’m wondering whether for three rotors it should be 1.5 times the number for 2 rotors.

 

I think that two pilots for that task is a much safer approach. 

 

I agree.  My test pilot feels he needs to expand the envelope a bit more before taking me along.  I didn’t do that this last flight because he didn’t have is parachute.  Probably next time.  He’s a cautious guy; and I guess that is not all bad.

 

Thanks for input.

 

Al

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster