Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #33635
From: Tracy Crook <lors01@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Flight test
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:00:59 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Glad to see your plane get some air under the tires Al.
 
It is not uncommon for the True Airspeed function to need some calibration.  The equipment required to do that in production (on the ground) is quite expensive and way beyond the RWS budget.   Main parameter to tweak is the Scale Factor.  Before doing that, make sure the sensor offset is adjusted to 1 less than the sensor output at zero airspeed  (with the EM2 warmed up and stabilized).  Also make sure your OAT sensor is getting the actual air temp.  If it is not, this throws off the TAS calculation since that is a significant factor in the equation.
 
Tracy
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Al Gietzen
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 2:08 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Flight test

Finally got the proper alignment of the planets (basically test pilot schedule) for further flight of Velocity 755V – 20B.  Plane was in the air for ˝ hour this time, basically at level cruise orbiting the airport.  OAT was about 90F and flight was at DA of about 7000’.

 

Since the first flight when oil temps were high, I added a temporary ram scoop under the ‘wing root’ oil cooler inlet.  Oil temp reached near 230 during climb but later stabilized at 200 - 205F.  Coolant stabilized at 180-185F.

 

I have video recording of EM2 display, and this time the pilot remembered to push the page button, so I have lots of data.  For ‘% power’ readout of 65-70%, engine rpm was 4450, prop 2050 rpm, IAS (according to pilot) was about 145 kts.  TAS readout on EM2 was 165-170 kts, but my calcs indicate this is about 5 kts too high.  Fuel burn was indicating 16-18 gph running rich of peak.

 

The in-cowl radiator is handling most of the cooling load; with the wing root rad being very ineffective.  This is consistent with the first flight results on the oil temps with the matching wing root oil cooler.  The scoop added for the OC improved the air flow, but it is still marginal, with oil delta T of about 20F and air delta T of about 100F.  It is likely the main issue is with the exit fairings.  At least now it flies stably, so I can do some other changes and see the effects – hopefully get a differential pressure measurement set up.

 

Takeoff roll of about 1500’ at 1900# weight is quite good considering fixed pitch prop.  It accelerates from rolling start to 60-65 kts nose lift in 6-7 seconds.  This with an 85” pitch prop.  Something special about Catto props.

 

The thing looks and sounds great, and I have to be happy that it went up, stayed up for ˝ hr, and made a perfect landing.  Main issues right now are on-going problem with EC2 data corruption; apparently unique to my installation, and possibly ‘noise’ related; and the need for right aileron input in order to go straight, suggesting a need for wing incidence adjustment.

 

Al

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster