X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [201.225.225.168] (HELO cwpanama.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.4) with ESMTP id 1400242 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:00:07 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.168; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuario5ebe209) by frontend2.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 77551149 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 22:36:38 -0500 Message-ID: <005401c6d6d8$35869410$6e5de0c9@usuario5ebe209> From: "Thomas y Reina Jakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Accused! - Open Letter to Paul Lamar, ACRE-newsletter; was: Motor-beam-mount, was Re: Engine alignment Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:59:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0051_01C6D6AE.4C79C4A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C6D6AE.4C79C4A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, I don't want to bore anyone with old dirty laundry, but I feel obliged = to correct a post on this list: A kind member of both lists (this one and the "other"....) brought to my = attention, that I was called a thief and other names on the "other" list - Yes, another PL-tale !! -=20 As the reason for this tale was posted by me on this list, I will = attempt to put things straight (most likely a futile effort, ...): I think the post concerned was about whether the Rotary (in a specific = application...) should/could be "plugs-up" (first PL-no/no) and whether = Jerry's S-beam would still work or not. Also CCI was mentioned as a = possible motormount (second PL-no/no). (See the original post at the very bottom of this message, I assume it = is the one that caused PL's wrath, ... again!) I then answered with my opinions about the CCI and Mistral mounts, and = that my choice would be to duplicate a beam-mount = used/r&d'ed/designed/built by Richard Martin (then and possibly still = involved in the installation of a Rotary Engine in a helicopter = project).=20 I added some pics to illustrate the mount. The pics I received with a post concerning beam mounts from Paul Lamar's = ACRE list, when I still was on it. I did not specifically mention (... unfortunately), that the pics where = taken by Mr. Paul Lamar, owner of the ACRE-list, but I did mention, that = this info, including the pics originated (for me, anyway...) from the = "other" list. see pink highlight in the original message below! The kind member of both lists mentioned above, forwarded the following = posting on the other list to me: quote 1: -Slim ball parasites- Slim ball parasites posting my pictures on other rotary engine list. Not a word from where they originated. I kicked the low life jerk off the list a long while back:) He did not even bother to change the names.=20 These are three examples. I took these pictures in in Arlington 2004 thanks to hospitality of Richard Martin Last picture is of Richard Martin. I am pissed. I am getting ready to sue. ...end of quote 1. Same day later from a different source on the same newsletter: quote 2: Paul, That's still the best mount I've seen for the Rotary . George (down under) That does not excuse him from stealing my pictures. Paul Lamar ...No rotor no motor. =20 ...end of quote 2. Just to make it clear: I will forward this post directly to Mr. Paul = Lamar by email, though I think he is on this list anyway! Open letter to Mr. Paul Lamar: Mr. Lamar, a) I apologize that I did not mention you directly as the "owner" of = the pictures in question.=20 At the time I posted them I was not aware that they where taken by you = and not given to you by Richard Martin. I did mention that I obtained them from a post on the "other list", when = I still was on this list. (...which, I hope we can agree upon, always means/meant the other one of = the 2 lists -=20 ACRE , or AREN as you seem to call it now and FlyRotary, depending on = which list it gets posted.) I re-read the post and you do state that you took the pics, so again, I = apologize for not specifically mentioning that fact. b) On your website you mention somewhere, that it (... your website) = is for the general benefit and advancement of the Rotary Engine as an = alternative aircraft engine. I admire your knowledge/insight/dedication to the Rotary and your = (generally) free advice and willingness to make your ideas and R&D = available to the public. c) It surprises me that much more when you start to "retail" against = someone that supposedly infringed on your rights. d) In the past, whenever I referred someone new to the Rotary engine = in aviation, I always pointed them to both lists. By the time I got kicked off your list, I started to warn people about = posting opposing opinions on your list, as that might get them retired = real fast. But, Mr. Lamar, I never got that low to call you any names! And I never will! (I do not consider attributes that where jokingly made on this list as = "calling names", your view may differ .....) It is amazing, that on a basically un-moderated newsletter like = FlyRotary, one never reads about anybody getting called names, .... = except when you get quoted!=20 e) If it means so much to you, why don't you title all your online = material with "copyright Paul Lamar" - this is very easy to do, = especially on pictures. If you are so serious about it I suggest to change your Greek = "copyright" to English, as very few people will be able to get the note = in Greek!=20 This way, the originator of any info you post on your website and/or = newsletter will be known. Generally I refer people to your site, so they may find out for = themselves.=20 Just sometimes things are faster/easier/simpler to forward. f) On the specific case, the question was about motormounts. As I know your stand on copyright and giving credit where it is due, I = very much did give credit to the man who made the part, Richard Martin. see pink highlight in the original message below! g) Copyright:=20 Remember one thing, Mr.Lamar - you did freely send these pictures along = with the post on your newsletter (2004, if I remember right...). At the = time this message was sent I still belonged to the list of receivers, so = I certainly did not steal them! Furthermore I did never pretend that these pics are mine or taken by me. Finally, these pics where never used by me in any commercial / financial = / reputation beneficial way towards me. (Well, maybe Jerry gets a couple of bucks if Ben goes that direction, = and if Jerry accepts the challenge...) note to Jerry and Ben: Please consult with Mr. Lamar on copyright issues before proceeding with = any idea or design resulting from my post! Your pics where simply used to transfer an idea for a possible solution = for a fellow rotary enthusiast (...something you claim your web-presence pursues too, in one way or = another).=20 Again, I did not claim any personal achievements on any of this (... not = the motormount, nor the photos).=20 I would not be able to do so, as I am at the bottom of the learning = curve concerning Rotaries.=20 But, I do observe/ask/question/suggest - I understand this is all a = newsletter is about!=20 So, if I can I will point things out to fellow list members, in case = they are not aware of a fact/issue/idea/etc.. h) It is appalling, that a man of your = education/experience/professional success/intellect, returns to the state of a badmouthed teen when you feel infringed on = your rights (copy or other)! Mr. Lamar, a simple email with the details pointed out would have been = all it needed! h1) You posted "He did not even bother to change the names." Can you explain what you mean with that??=20 What for would I want to change any names? Credit to whom it is due! I never intended to change any names nor would I see a need to do so.=20 No intention to hide anything!! i) Considering my perception of your lack of education in civilized = communications skills, I do not expect any reply from you to this = letter. I don't think you have the courage to do so!=20 Just as I gave up to ever find the reason for being "kicked off as a low = life jerk a long while back" (quote from your post on your = newsletter....). To this day I have really no idea what bothered you so much to kick me = off without any explanation/accusation! (Just a little refresher, you never called my attention on any = issue/post/etc. You went to Oskosh '04, and that was it. After that I = was off the list.) An educated person at least answers emailed inquiries to why or what.=20 Did it ever occur to you, that you might have mistaken me for someone = else? If someone claimed any statements supposedly made by me, wouldn't it be = prudent to investigate the truth? I bet the same questions would come from some of the other members in = the "Kicked-off"-Club on this list! j) There is a good percentage of Non-native English speakers on this = list (... and where on yours, at the time I "was" left...). It is inevitable that sometimes things get translated the wrong way or = misunderstandings arise. Prudence calls at least for an effort to = straighten out issues.=20 Of course this will not excuse the "low-life actions" of all the native = speakers in the "Kicked-off"-Club! k) Just denying discussion of a subject, because you do not agree = with it, does nothing to resolve the basic issue. I refer specifically to the "plugs-up" issue as a sample. We all know you don't like it - but you never brought up a single reason = (that would stand scrutiny...) why it should not be used, why it is = "dangerous", why it can't be done. All you say is "no" and whoever = disagrees is out!! You seem to carry over this attitude to lesser things just the same. By the way "plugs-up" seems to work just great and there is a whole list = of benefits to this installation - besides possible space = considerations, which brought up this configuration in the first place.=20 The same goes for any members on this fine list, that ever got kicked = off yours. Common sense would reason, that if these guys are all "low life jerks", = that they would continue to be so on any other list and just the same in = their lives - it is hard to change what you are!=20 However I had to come to the conclusion that all members on this list = (FlyRotary) whom I am aware off, are rather extremely polite and = educated people=20 (...in this case education has nothing to do with = University/College/whatever degree....).=20 I did frequent other newslists, where there is more mud-slinging than = subject discussion. Not so here! What this means, Mr. Lamar, is, that you are very, very wrong in your = assessment of most of those whom you rejected. This is not my subjective opinion - but a simple objective observation = over time. Enough said..... If you care to reply, please do so - on your list (I am sure I will get = the message:)), on this list, or to my email, listed below. Best Regards, Thomas Jakits Rotary Enthusiast rijakits@cwpanama.net PS: Mr. Lamar, if you seriously consider and desire to sue, please go = ahead! If you want to waist your time/effort/money/nerves over some photo = credit issues showing the work of someone else,=20 then you deserve all the misery you will receive from your legal effort! There are lots of times in life you don't get what you think you should! = ..........Get over and on with it !! original message below, pictures = eliminated!=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Thomas y Reina Jakits=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 8:56 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Motor-beam-mount, was Re: Engine alignment Hi Ben, even if you can't use one of Jerry's S-beams, he should be able to = weld you one of these babies (see attached pics). Lay them out the way you need them, have some knowledgeable engineer = math it and off you go! Startermount included, and also check the turbo-pack!! Photos are from an old post on the "other" list. Richard Martin is "responsible" for that beauty, working for a = helicopter project... I have pics, if you need/want them, but these are the most "visible" = ones! I assume a CCI would do also-sideways, though I do not really like the = loadpath of the CCI. Another alternative is the Mistral backplate mount, but again, I don't = really like the loadpath through the engine. My personal go is something like the pics show - or a S-beam - the = load gets picked up there and the engine is left alone. Keep on mind the pics show a mount for a helicopter project, but I = believe it should be possible to get it right for plane inthe same = manner, though possibly with different dimensions. Thomas J. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ben Baltrusaitis=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 11:41 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine alignment Dale, Please post pictures of your mount or send them to me directly. I am = also considering plugs up on my Acroduster Too mostly to help with = inverted flight and oil, but also because a high thrust line is = preferred on the plane. Do you see any negatives with the installation other than not being = able to use Jerry Hey's S-Beam Mount? Do you know if plugs up will work with George's (down under) bell = housing? Thanks! Ben ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C6D6AE.4C79C4A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello all,
 
I don't want to bore anyone with old dirty laundry, = but I feel=20 obliged to correct a post on this list:
 
A kind member of both lists (this one and the=20 "other"....) brought to my attention, that I was called a thief and = other=20 names on the "other" list
- Yes, another PL-tale !! -
 
As the reason for this tale was posted by = me on this=20 list, I will attempt to put things straight (most likely = a futile=20 effort, ...):
 
I think the post concerned was about whether = the Rotary=20 (in a specific application...) should/could be "plugs-up" = (first=20 PL-no/no) and whether Jerry's S-beam would still work or not. Also=20 CCI was mentioned as a possible motormount (second=20 PL-no/no).
(See the original post at = the very=20 bottom of this message, I assume it is the one that caused PL's wrath, = ...=20 again!)
 
I then answered with my opinions about the CCI and = Mistral=20 mounts, and that my choice would be to duplicate a beam-mount=20 used/r&d'ed/designed/built by Richard Martin (then and possibly = still involved in the installation of a Rotary Engine in a = helicopter=20 project).
I added some pics to illustrate the = mount.
 
The pics I received with a post concerning beam=20 mounts from Paul Lamar's ACRE list, when I still was on=20 it.
I did not specifically mention (... = unfortunately), that=20 the pics where taken by Mr. Paul Lamar, owner of the ACRE-list, but I = did=20 mention, that this info, including the pics originated (for me,=20 anyway...) from the "other" list. see pink = highlight in=20 the original message below!
 
The kind member of both lists mentioned above, = forwarded the=20 following posting on the other list to me:
 
quote = 1:
 
-Slim ball=20 parasites-
Slim ball parasites posting = my pictures=20 on other
rotary engine list. Not a word from where they = originated.
I=20 kicked the low life jerk off the list a long while back:)
He did not = even=20 bother to change the names.

These are three examples. I took = these=20 pictures in
in Arlington 2004 thanks to hospitality of Richard=20 Martin

Last picture is of Richard Martin.

I am pissed. I = am=20 getting ready to sue.
 
...end of=20 quote 1.
 
 
Same day later from a = different source=20 on the same newsletter:
 
quote=20 2:
 
Paul,
That's still the = best mount=20 I've seen for the Rotary .
George (down under)

That does not = excuse=20 him from stealing my pictures.

Paul Lamar ...No rotor no=20 motor.
 
...end of=20 quote 2.
 
 
Just to make = it clear: I=20 will forward this post directly to Mr. Paul Lamar by email, though I = think he is=20 on this list anyway!
 
Open letter to = Mr. Paul=20 Lamar:
 
 
Mr. Lamar,
 
a)   =20 I apologize that I did not mention you directly as the = "owner" of=20 the pictures in question.
At the time I posted them I = was not=20 aware that they where taken by you and not given to you by Richard=20 Martin.
I did = mention=20 that I obtained them from a post on the "other list", when I still was = on this=20 list.
(...which, I hope we can = agree upon,=20 always means/meant the other one of the 2 lists -
ACRE , or=20 AREN as you seem to call it now and FlyRotary, = depending on=20 which list it gets posted.)
 
I re-read the post and you=20 do state that you took the pics, so again, I = apologize=20 for not specifically mentioning that fact.
 
b)   =20 On your website you mention somewhere, that it (... your=20 website) is for the general benefit and advancement of the Rotary = Engine as=20 an alternative aircraft engine.
I admire your=20 knowledge/insight/dedication to the Rotary and your (generally) free = advice and=20 willingness to make your ideas and R&D available to the = public.
 
c)   =20 It surprises me that much more when you start to "retail" = against=20 someone that supposedly infringed on your rights.
 
d)   =20 In the past, whenever I referred someone new to the Rotary = engine=20 in aviation, I always pointed them to both=20 lists.
By the time I got kicked = off your list,=20 I started to warn people about posting opposing opinions on your list, = as that=20 might get them retired real fast.
But, Mr.=20 Lamar, I never got that low to call you = any=20 names!
And I never = will!
(I do not consider = attributes that=20 where jokingly made on this list as "calling names", your view may = differ=20 .....)
 
It is amazing, that on = a basically=20 un-moderated newsletter like FlyRotary, one = never=20 reads about anybody getting called names, .... except when=20 you get quoted!
 
e)   =20 If it means so much to you, why = don't=20 you title all your online material with = "copyright=20 Paul Lamar" - this is very easy to do, especially on = pictures.
If you are so serious about = it I=20 suggest to change your Greek "copyright" to English, as very few people = will be=20 able to get the note in Greek!
 
This way, the originator of = any info=20 you post on your website and/or newsletter will be known.
 
Generally I refer people to = your site,=20 so they may find out for themselves.
Just sometimes things are=20 faster/easier/simpler to forward.
 
f)   =20 On the specific case, the question was about=20 motormounts.
As I know your stand on = copyright and=20 giving credit where it is due, I very much did give=20 credit to the man who made the part, Richard = Martin.
see pink = highlight in the=20 original message below!
 
g)   =20 Copyright:
Remember one thing, = Mr.Lamar - you did=20 freely send these pictures along with the post on your newsletter (2004, = if I=20 remember right...). At the time this message was sent I still belonged = to the=20 list of receivers, so I certainly did not steal=20 them!
 
Furthermore I did never = pretend that=20 these pics are mine or taken by me.
 
Finally, these pics where = never used by=20 me in any commercial / financial / reputation beneficial way = towards=20 me.
 
(Well, maybe Jerry gets a = couple of=20 bucks if Ben goes that direction, and=20 if Jerry accepts the = challenge...)
 
note to Jerry and=20 Ben:
Please consult with Mr. = Lamar on=20 copyright issues before proceeding with any idea or design resulting = from my=20 post!
 
Your pics where simply = used to=20 transfer an idea for a possible solution for a fellow rotary=20 enthusiast
(...something you claim = your=20 web-presence pursues too, in one way or another).
 
Again, I did not claim any = personal=20 achievements on any of this (... not the motormount, nor the photos).=20
I would not be able to do = so, as I am=20 at the bottom of the learning curve concerning Rotaries.
 
But, I do=20 observe/ask/question/suggest - I understand this = is all a=20 newsletter is about!
So, if I can I will = point things=20 out to fellow list members, in case they are not aware of a=20 fact/issue/idea/etc..
 
h)   =20 It is appalling, that a man of your=20 education/experience/professional success/intellect,
returns to the state of a = badmouthed=20 teen when you feel infringed on your rights (copy or = other)!
 
Mr. Lamar, a simple email = with the=20 details pointed out would have been all it needed!
 
h1)   =20 You posted "He did not even bother to change the=20 names."
Can you explain what you = mean with=20 that??
What for would I want to = change any=20 names? Credit to whom it is due!
I never intended to change = any names=20 nor would I see a need to do so.
No intention to hide=20 anything!!
 
i)   =20 Considering my perception of=20 your lack of=20 education in civilized communications skills, I do not = expect any=20 reply from you to this letter.
I don't think you have the = courage to=20 do so!
 
Just as I gave up to ever = find the=20 reason for being "kicked off as a low life jerk a long while back" = (quote from=20 your post on your newsletter....).
To this day I have really = no idea what=20 bothered you so much to kick me off without any=20 explanation/accusation!
(Just a little refresher, = you never=20 called my attention on any issue/post/etc. You went to Oskosh '04, and = that was=20 it. After that I was off the list.)
An educated person at least = answers=20 emailed inquiries to why or what.
Did it ever occur to you, = that you=20 might have mistaken me for someone else?
If someone claimed any = statements=20 supposedly made by me, wouldn't it be prudent to investigate the=20 truth?
I bet the same = questions would=20 come from some of the other members in the "Kicked-off"-Club = on this=20 list!
 
j)   =20 There is a good percentage of Non-native English speakers = on this=20 list (... and where on yours, at the time I "was" left...).
It is inevitable that = sometimes things=20 get translated the wrong way or misunderstandings arise. Prudence calls = at least=20 for an effort to straighten out issues.
Of course this will not = excuse the=20 "low-life actions" of all the native speakers = in the=20 "Kicked-off"-Club!
 
k)   =20 Just denying discussion of a subject, because you do not = agree=20 with it, does nothing to resolve the basic issue.
I refer specifically to the = "plugs-up"=20 issue as a sample.
We all know you don't like = it - but you=20 never brought up a single reason (that would stand = scrutiny...) why it=20 should not be used, why it is "dangerous", why it can't be done. = All you say is "no" and whoever disagrees is out!!
 
You seem to carry over this = attitude to=20 lesser things just the same.
 
By the way "plugs-up" seems = to work=20 just great and there is a whole list of benefits=20 to this installation - besides possible space considerations,=20 which brought up this configuration in the first place. =
 
The same goes for any = members on this=20 fine list, that ever got kicked off yours.
Common sense would reason, = that=20 if these guys are all "low life jerks", that = they=20 would continue to be so on any other list and just the same in = their lives=20 - it is hard to change what you are!
However I had to come to = the conclusion=20 that all members on this list (FlyRotary) whom I am aware off, are = rather=20 extremely polite and educated people
(...in this case = education has=20 nothing to do with University/College/whatever degree....). =
I did frequent other = newslists, where=20 there is more mud-slinging than subject discussion. Not so = here!
 
What this means, Mr. Lamar, = is, that=20 you are very, very wrong in your assessment of most of those whom you=20 rejected.
This is not=20 my subjective opinion - but a simple objective observation = over=20 time.
 
 
 
Enough = said.....
 
If you care to reply, = please do so - on=20 your list (I am sure I will get the message:)),
on this list,
or to my email, listed=20 below.
 
Best Regards,
 
Thomas Jakits
Rotary = Enthusiast
rijakits@cwpanama.net
 
PS: Mr. Lamar, if you = seriously=20 consider and desire to sue, please go ahead!
If you want to waist your=20 time/effort/money/nerves over some photo credit issues showing the = work of=20 someone else,
then you deserve all the = misery you=20 will receive from your legal = effort!
 
There are lots of = times in life=20 you don't get what you think you = should!=20 ..........Get over and on with it=20 !!
 
 
 
 
 
original message below, pictures = eliminated!=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Thomas y=20 Reina Jakits
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, = 2006 8:56=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] = Motor-beam-mount,=20 was Re: Engine alignment

Hi Ben,
 
even if you can't use = one of=20 Jerry's S-beams, he should be able to weld you one of these babies = (see=20 attached pics).
Lay them out the way = you need them,=20 have some knowledgeable engineer math it and off you go!
Startermount = included, and also=20 check the turbo-pack!!
Photos are from an = old post on the=20 "other" list.
Richard Martin is = "responsible" for=20 that beauty, working for a helicopter project...
 
I have pics, if you = need/want them,=20 but these are the most "visible" ones!
 
 
I assume a CCI would = do=20 also-sideways, though I do not really like the loadpath of the=20 CCI.
Another alternative = is the Mistral=20 backplate mount, but again, I don't really like the loadpath through = the=20 engine.
My personal go is = something like=20 the pics show - or a S-beam - the load gets picked up there and the = engine is=20 left alone.
Keep on mind the pics = show a mount=20 for a helicopter project, but I believe it should be possible to get = it right=20 for plane inthe same manner, though possibly with different=20 dimensions.
 
Thomas = J.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Ben = Baltrusaitis
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft=20
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, = 2006 11:41=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Engine=20 alignment

Dale,
Please = post pictures of=20 your mount or send them to me directly. I am also considering plugs = up on my=20 Acroduster Too mostly to help with inverted flight and oil, but also = because=20 a high thrust line is preferred on the plane.
Do you = see any=20 negatives with the installation other than not being able to use = Jerry Hey's=20 S-Beam Mount?
Do you = know if plugs up=20 will work with George's (down under) bell housing?
Thanks!
Ben
 
------=_NextPart_000_0051_01C6D6AE.4C79C4A0--