X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtai20.cox.net ([68.230.241.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1370012 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:56:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.39; envelope-from=steve@stevet.net Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060908161243.NEOP6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:12:43 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.203] ([68.6.58.190]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id KsCk1V00J46FLUs0000000 Fri, 08 Sep 2006 12:12:44 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steve Thomas Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust System - Comments? Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 09:12:42 -0700 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Thanks to all for your responses. I will do the slip joint at the flange as you-all suggest. I also plan to do a slip joint just after the collector. And, the muffler is mounted on rubber bushings. Bob, yes, I bought the whole package, including the reduction unit. I'll keep you-all posted on my progress with the exhaust setup. Best Regards, Steve Thomas SteveT.Net ________________________________________________________________________ On Sep 7, 2006, at 9:40 PM, Joe Hull wrote: > Looks good to me - but I would have Burns do it in the thickest > piece of 321 > they have (which I think is .049). Also, the slip joint at the > flange is a > good idea too - more like a necessary idea. Watch for places where > you will > have differential vibration/movement. I.e. the engine is on rubber > mounts > and moves independent of the fuselage - so if you support the > exhaust on the > engine and on the engine mount/fuselage - you've go different > movement. You > will need to de-couple the parts so they can move independent of one > another. > > Joe Hull > Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - Rotary 13B NA) > Redmond (Seattle), Washington > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft >> [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On >> Behalf Of Steve Thomas >> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 5:29 PM >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Exhaust System - Comments? >> >> I have been lurking on this list for some time, really enjoying and >> learning from all of your experiences. I'm the guy who has Mistral's >> serial number 001, two rotor normally aspirated engine. >> >> I just finished tacking this exhaust system together and thought that >> I'd ask for comments. The current material is mild steel, but my >> plan is to take it to Burns Stainless (just down the road from me) >> and have them duplicate it in 16 ga. 321 stainless. The collector >> is from Burns, as is the muffler. If you can see the tacks, you'll >> be able to see why I'm taking it elsewhere. ;-) The header pipes >> are 2" and the combined pipe after the collector is 2 1/2". This was >> recommended by Burns. >> >> After fabrication, I plan to have it coated with HPC HyperCoat >> Extreme as my design goal was to get the heat out as quickly and >> directly as possible and keep as much in the pipes as possible until >> it exits to atmosphere. >> >> The oddball bends in the header were designed to keep the header >> pipes the same length, which they are. Given all the difficulty some >> have had with their exhaust systems, I'd thought that I'd throw it >> out there for comments. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Steve Thomas >> SteveT.Net >> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> ___ > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >