X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.237] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1351442 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:13:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.249.82.237; envelope-from=barrygardner@gmail.com Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1461014wxd for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:12:24 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=Hu3dD1ndZYDhtAEKYKorl+jpTKGwK6ZVEwkWoecTh8CZ+9xifaO1tbpjN9Nr3wbp13MSYn0kihpIHUczSweI2z3SVBTXQ/XjivDGMJWB5FVOjLGutfU2TxmlS6dK6DrivEZ4YiJfLqu93pVfW/rCjP0WaiRQ/ddArCcAJfhrW8M= Received: by 10.70.15.15 with SMTP id 15mr8318316wxo; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from dellc400 ( [75.4.105.130]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 43sm4972557wri.2006.08.27.17.12.22; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0ff101c6ca36$9d8ff5a0$800101df@dellc400> From: "Barry Gardner" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: prop speed Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:12:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Darrah" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 4:19 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: prop speed > Well, guys, I think you should look at this a little differently. The > rotational tip speed pf the prop is at right angles to the forward speed > and should be added vectorially. As a result, it adds very little. For > example, a 72 inch prop turning 2400 RPM going 180 MPH results in a > rotational speed of 6' times pi or 18.85 feet per REV. Now, the forward > speed in that length of time (1/30 of a second at 2400 RPM) is only 8.8 > feet. Add those vectorially (the two sides of a right triangle) and the > result is 20.8 feet per rev, almost within 10% of using RPM only. > > > > FWIW > > Bob Darrah Thanks, Bob. That's exactly the kind of help I was looking for. It still sounds like the hoverhawk.com site recommendations would be biased on the high side. Barry Gardner Wheaton, IL/