X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ispmxmta09-srv.windstream.net ([166.102.165.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1318996 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:54:47 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.102.165.170; envelope-from=jskmberki@alltel.net Received: from ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net ([71.31.134.62]) by ispmxmta09-srv.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20060727235359.HAQH3855.ispmxmta09-srv.windstream.net@ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net> for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:53:59 -0500 Received: from joehomepc ([71.31.134.62]) by ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net with SMTP id <20060727235358.ECVJ560.ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net@joehomepc> for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:53:58 -0500 Message-ID: <009701c6b1d7$d3c84400$01fea8c0@joehomepc> From: "Joe Berki" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:53:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0094_01C6B1B6.4C629090" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C6B1B6.4C629090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It looks like it might work for my application. I was wondering how = much HP I would be giving up, plus the additional weight. On the = positive side it may give up the heat slower and keep the under cowl = tems lower plus it has to absorb some noise. P port won't work in this = scenario either. Joe Berki Limo EZ ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Joe Hull=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 7:46 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Exhaust I know of one successful installation using the stock exhaust manifold = - that is Perry Mick in Oregon. He's been running if from day one and = seems to like it a lot. He's tried to convince me to go with the stock = manifold.maybe I should have listened J =20 Joe Hull Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - Rotary 13B NA)=20 Redmond (Seattle), Washington =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Joe Berki Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:36 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: ***SPAM*** [FlyRotary] Exhaust =20 Joe, I am glad everything turned out OK and that you are safe. I have a = question on exhaust systems as I am trying to see what will work in the = narrow confines of the Limo EZ. Has anyone used the stock cast iron = exhaust manifold successfully? The motor mount tubes make it tight if = the bends need to be generous. I have this idea to bring the exaust up = to the top of the engine into an augmenter that runs the entire length = of the cowl. The augmenter will be bolted to the engine mount and will = serve as part of the upper cowl. Heat rises so why soak the engine = during post shutdown and ground ops? The intake tubes will run into the = wing root where the injectors and airbos will reside. Thanks for any = help. =20 Joe Berki Limo EZ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: = 7/21/2006 ------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C6B1B6.4C629090 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It looks like it might work for my=20 application.  I was wondering how much HP I would be giving = up, plus=20 the additional weight.  On the positive side it may give up the = heat slower=20 and keep the under cowl tems lower plus it has to absorb some noise. =  P=20 port won't work in this scenario either.
 
Joe Berki
Limo EZ
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Joe Hull=20
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 = 7:46=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Exhaust

I know of = one=20 successful installation using the stock exhaust manifold =96 that is = Perry Mick=20 in Oregon.=20 He=92s been running if from day one and seems to like it a lot. He=92s = tried to=20 convince me to go with the stock manifold=85maybe I should have = listened=20 J

 

Joe = Hull

Cozy Mk-IV N31CZ (65 hrs - = Rotary 13B NA)=20

Redmond (Seattle), Washington

 

From:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of Joe Berki
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 = 4:36=20 PM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: ***SPAM*** [FlyRotary] = Exhaust

 

Joe,

I am glad everything = turned out OK=20 and that you are safe.  I have a question on exhaust systems as I = am=20 trying to see what will work in the narrow confines of the Limo = EZ.  Has=20 anyone used the stock cast iron exhaust manifold successfully?  = The motor=20 mount tubes make it tight if the bends need to be = generous.  I=20 have this idea to bring the exaust up to the top of the engine into an = augmenter that runs the entire length of the cowl.  The augmenter = will be=20 bolted to the engine mount and will serve as part of the upper = cowl. =20 Heat rises so why soak the engine during post shutdown and ground = ops? =20 The intake tubes will run into the wing root where the injectors and = airbos=20 will reside.  Thanks for any = help.

 

Joe=20 Berki

Limo=20 EZ

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free = Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release = Date:=20 7/21/2006
------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C6B1B6.4C629090--