In a message dated 7/2/2006 9:32:00 AM Central Standard Time,
dale.r@cox.net writes:
Huh? What's secret about it? If the link is
part of one's sig-line, everyone who gets your message will see the
URL.
I was referring to the past, not the proposed. The above makes sense to
me.
You are looking at the "whole" list. I only had two builder's data to work with, at the moment. Scroll up or down from whichever one you started with to see everyone else's.
Pardon my relative web-niavity. I finally got it. (I think)
That's a little more difficult. Letting
folks add their own information requires allowing them "edit" privileges
to the site. The only _practical_ way I know of doing that is
something like the Wiki. I'll defer to our Wikipedia expert as to
whether this is a suitable format for a Wiki
page.
Understood, but that doesn't make it undesirable.
My intention was to compile the data from
submissions and manually update as necessary (shouldn't be too often, I'd
guess) the same way the Rotary Roster is currently
maintainedL
According to what I now see the list looks really good. I guess my problem
was not really being hit between the eyes that such a list was in existence.
According to some of the other posts, I was not alone.
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html
.
Recognize that this level of detail is entirely dependent on
the discipline of the builder to provide it. I can lay out a "form"
- Ed's is a good start - but, if the Rotary Roster is any indication, not
everyone will "fill in" all the
blocks.
Understood. That is a loss for all of us.
Rich, it's only _data_. I think you have
too high hope for what a simple list can do. What discloses the
problems is the individual reports we get from the builders - *way* too
much data to put in a simple
table.
So let's put our collective heads together and with the probable computer
knowledge available from this group, find a way. (Didn't they say that man would
never fly?)
Rich (really appreciative of what you have done, Dale, looking
for possible expansion)
|