X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with ESMTP id 1221471 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:33:55 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.37; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from [192.168.1.101] (really [68.2.139.17]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060702233309.SVKU12581.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@[192.168.1.101]> for ; Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:33:09 -0400 Message-ID: <44A8574E.3050501@cox.net> Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:31:26 -0700 From: Dale Rogers Reply-To: dale.r@cox.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: So many questions, so little time References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kelly Troyer wrote:

Dale,

Do you want only currently flying a/c or can current projects be added to the list ?

If projects qualify how can one add to the list ?

--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2

Folks,

   I'm going to get a little bit arbitrary here. Considering the original
purpose of Rich's request was to facilitate correlation of "what works"
against "what doesn't". I don't see a purpose for having unfinished projects
on the configuration list. Dave may feel differently, if he decides to
integrate this effort into the Rotary Roster (Yes, I've sent him an email
asking if he'd like to make this a collaborative effort.) Note that Dave has
a separate section for Flying vs. non-flying aircraft.

   My own entry is in there just to act as a filler. As soon as I have five
flying entries, I will remove mine from the list I'm maintaining. On the
other hand, if anyone has an engine running on a test stand, I'd like to
include that too - it only makes sense to include any engine that is
producing "reliability data". I guess it makes sense to include any
aircraft that has started taxi testing, too.

   Is that broad enough?

Dale R.