X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf04aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1127564 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 May 2006 10:27:42 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.52; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm56aec.bellsouth.net ([72.153.193.173]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060525132634.OWZE28702.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm56aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 09:26:34 -0400 Received: from [72.153.193.173] by ibm56aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060525132633.QRBT1096.ibm56aec.bellsouth.net@[72.153.193.173]> for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 09:26:33 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v750) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6A49B361-8F4E-451A-8163-16DB500B6633@bellsouth.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bulent Aliev Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Spark plug gap (was Re: Another case of heat-soaked coils? Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:26:56 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.750) On May 25, 2006, at 9:12 AM, Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 5/24/2006 11:42:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > dcarter11@sbcglobal.net writes: > I can't remember the reason for using the "test spark plug gapped > at .010". Lynn, would you cover that again? > At high RPM the amount of time a Kettering coil has to saturate, or > develop a full flux field before the primary field supply is opened > to fire the coil on field collapse. So, the output voltage of the > coil drops with RPM. So when you need great coil performance, you > are getting into the poorest range of the coil's performance. In > order to eliminate low secondary output as the cause of a high > speed miss, you shorten the gap so as to reduce the voltage > required to fire the plug. > > So, if you make no other changes, and performance is restored on > shortening the gap, the problem may be ignition performance related. > > High energy systems do not build a flux field in the coil, and then > wait for a field collapse to generate the high voltage to fire the > plug as in the Kettering system. The high energy system applies 350 > volts to the coil primary from a fully charged capacitor. The coil > fires as the flux field expands through the secondary on the way to > saturation. The high primary voltage overcoming the inductive > reactance of the primary that acts like a resistor in the 12 volt > system. When the primary circuit is opened, you get another hit on > field collapse (from a fully involved flux field) that is like a > Kettering system at idle. Some systems let the coil primary and > capacitor ring like a simple tank circuit so as to keep pulsing the > gap once an ionized path is established. > > There is enough excess energy at the plug gap that an arc may > develop to a ring or wrist watch held close to a plug boot. This > will not be the warning sting as from the lawn mower. > This will be the micro nap on the way to the ground, where you will > rest a while and try to remember your name. > > If you have Stents or a Pacemaker, it could be fatal. Modern > automotive systems are so labeled. > > Lynn E. Hanover Lynn, where do we stand with John? Our engines have the high compression rotors and they are turbocharged. Should we use different plugs than the stock ones that everyone uses? Thanks Buly http://tinyurl.com/dcy36