Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: flyrotary
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:35:09 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1840521@logan.com>
From: "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
References: <list-1831822@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP pumping, pumping...... still pumping
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


----- Original Message -----
From: "Perry Casson" <pcasson@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 6:55 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP pumping, pumping...... still pumping


> A couple interesting things I found on the web regarding the EWP.
>
> Scroll down to nearly the bottom to and check out the installation in the
> photo under "Cooling System".  I've emailed the guy to ask how the unit
has
> performed and will post his response.
> http://www.scuderiatopolino.com/Links/engine.htm
>
> A bit more alarming is this:
> http://www.autospeed.co.nz/A_0569/page1.html?src=suggestions
> I wonder if they would share results under a NDA?
>
> Perry Casson

Hi Perry,

The last website was rather interesting about what they (the testers) had to
say after extensive testing of the Davies EWP on two different cars on
dynos - NOTHING, claiming threats of legal action by Davies company lawyers.
But, thats only their half of the story, be interesting to hear the
companies side of the story. Depending on how you set up a test and what you
use for a criteria, you can come up with almost any results you want.

Ed Anderson