X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.73] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1071107 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:07:28 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.73; envelope-from=brecab@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm69aec.bellsouth.net ([68.210.152.231]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060417210643.WLFS26216.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm69aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:06:43 -0400 Received: from 1dd8d01.bellsouth.net ([68.210.152.231]) by ibm69aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060417210643.QFMU905.ibm69aec.bellsouth.net@1dd8d01.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:06:43 -0400 Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.1.20060417171515.02349428@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:16:37 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: CCI Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Yet another FIRST FLIGHT! In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Congratulations, Joe, for a trouble free first flight! Fred At 01:03 PM 4/17/2006 -0700, you wrote: >Having "finished" my plane and signed off in January, I've been tinkering >with minor improvements, engine tuning, and building up my own flying >currency ever since. Just about the time all of that came together the >infamous Pacific Northwest weather socked us in and it looked like it would >be weeks, months, yea even years before I could do my first flight in N31CZ. >Well we got a temporary reprieve and today was the day! At about 8:45AM PDT, >N31CZ defied the laws of physics and actually left the hard but comfortable >surface of our planet! > >Takeoff was picture perfect - IF you think porpoises are perfect! I thought >I was holding back pressure on the stick and at about 75kts when my flight >advisor (Tom Staggs), who was behind me, calmly said "rotate" (since I >obviously wasn't doing it on my own!), I somewhat aggressively pulled back >on the stick (yes, despite what I planned and what we had just talked >about). YIKES! Not only does that make the nose leave the runway in a big >hurry - but if your ailerons aren't neutral - you'll also make a pretty >quick turn at about 10feet!!! My cat like reflexes aside - it was a very >colorful start! > >Once I settled down and opened my eyes again I was climbing at what my >airspeed indicator said was about 95-100kts. We made it to 600 feet AGL and >began a continuous, slow, climbing turn to crosswind and downwind. (not sure >why I was making it a gentle turn - I already learned that it could turn on >a dime!). We continued the climb and leveled off at 3000AGL to settle down >and look things over. There were lots of dirty gray puff-ball clouds >floating about between 3000 and 4000 feet so we angled out "race track" >pattern between the clouds and checked out maneuverability. Remarkably it >seems I have a good balance of errors in the airframe because it flew >straight and level hands off - aileron trim centered. I expected to have at >least a few issues - I don't know why - it just seems like the precision, or >lack thereof, of foam, fiberglass, and filler/micro would lead to more >anomalies. But I'll accept it! > >The Mazda Rotary, 13B (non-turbo) engine worked fine. Not great, but fine. >Temps were in the mid-170's for both oil and water the whole time. (Outside >air temp was 35F-40F). But power was a little anemic, so I'll still have >some tuning to explore. > >During our check of the lower speeds (70-80kts) I discovered that my >airspeed indicator is off by about 12-15kts on the low end and 10kts in the >110-120kt range. When I was reading 90kts, Tom was calling out 78kts. It is >great that I had someone flying chase and able to help confirm airspeed and >altimeter. So, a mental adjustment to all the pre-planned airspeeds was >needed. > >We had planned on at least one fly-by to get used to the sight picture and >get the feel of how the plane descends at various throttle settings. That >first pass was pretty good and at 50ft I throttled up to go around. The >second pass was just like the first - Oh, yeah, I'm actually supposed to >descend through 50ft AGL - actually I did but was introduced to Mr. Float! >Go around! The next time I had the picture and was able to make a relatively >unremarkable landing. > > From takeoff to landing I'm told it was 38 minutes. I'll just have to accept >that since I couldn't tell you whether it was 15 minutes or 2 hours. But it >is interesting that in one of those quirks that God devises that 0.4 hours >of flying time finished off another page in my log book and when I added up >the numbers after I got to work it turns out I now have EXACTLY 100.0 hours >as a pilot! Lord willing, it will be a couple thousand more before I'm done! > >Now for the Oscar's moment: "I'd like to thank..." >- My wife who puts up with all my crazy hobbies. >- Burt Rutan and Nat Puffer for making it so easy, even I could do it. >- Marc Z. and the Cozy "support group" - it made a huge difference >- Steve Foote - a friend who shared my building adventure >- Joe Person - EAA Tech counselor >- Tom Staggs - Flight Advisor - for spending hours of his time getting me >ready to fly and being there to hold my wing, errr hand while I stumbled >around the sky today! > >Joe Hull >Cozy Mk-IV #991 (In Phase1 Flight Test - 0.4 hrs flown!!) >Redmond (Seattle), Washington > > > >-- >Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/