Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 23:31:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <13brv3@mchsi.com> Received: from sccmmhc01.mchsi.com ([204.127.203.183] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b9) with ESMTP id 1831966 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 21:08:36 -0400 Received: from rad ([12.218.64.232]) by sccmmhc01.mchsi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021019010831.VKRJ1046.sccmmhc01.mchsi.com@rad> for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:08:31 +0000 Reply-To: <13brv3@mchsi.com> From: <13brv3@mchsi.com> X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: EWP pumping, pumping...... still pumping X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:08:31 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 A bit more alarming is this: http://www.autospeed.co.nz/A_0569/page1.html?src=suggestions I wonder if they would share results under a NDA? Perry Casson ------------------------ Yep, that's the one I was talking about. I really wish we knew the scoop on this. There must have been something they didn't like about the pump, but it might not have been anything we care about. I'm getting pretty excited about the EWP options again, but I'm going to wait until my engine is mounted to decide what I want to do. Since I'm having a mount made, I'll throw the engine on it, and see where I stand. If by some miracle, I don't have a problem with the height of the alt and WP, then I'll just use the stock parts. That's pretty unlikely with an RV-3 and stock thrust line. Great discussions though, and probably a world record number of messages in one day. Rusty Turbo 13B powered RV-3... Be Afraid :-) 1993 RX-7 R1... Stock (for now)