Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #30619
From: <WRJJRS@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA's, Cooling and Sport Aviation Mag..
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:25:36 EST
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Group,
The problem with submerged inlets, and Buly is correct to mention that means flush with the surface, is that they do not handle back pressure well. Ed A posted the original NACA data and their conclusion was that submerged inlets don't work well with RADIATORS. The comments PL has been making are only to re-publish the data. If you do a smoke tunnel test on submerged inlets you will find that once enough pressure is built up they will "flip" and hardly take in any air at all. The actual NACA ducts also have the carefully designed lips, or rounded edges to train the boundry layer into the inlet. The full profile defined by the NACA is rarely used. Most of the inlets we see are some attempt at looking like a NACA inlet, without the trouble of actually BEING a NACA inlet. We used to call this "eyeball engineering." Aircooled engines do work better with NACA inlets as there is less pressure differential than with a radiator. This doesn't mean they will never work, just that the NACA didn't recomend their use with a radiator/heat exchanger.
Bill Jepson
 
 
In a message dated 3/9/2006 8:24:30 PM Pacific Standard Time, atlasyts@bellsouth.net writes:
John, would you stop calling it a NACA scoop. Remove the big raised 
lip and make it flat. Than come and report to us. Your inlet is half 
submerged and half raised scoop. NACA is a flush with the surface 
SUBMERGED inlet.
Buly


On Mar 9, 2006, at 10:44 PM, John Slade wrote:

> Dave,
> My only cooling intake is the plans Cozy IV NACA.
> Cooling has never been a problem.
> Regards,
> John
>
> David Staten wrote:
>> At the risk of invoking PL's name, anyone else read this months 
>> Sport Aviation mag from EAA, and notice an article on cooling that 
>> seems to indicate that NACA's are acceptable and adequate for 
>> aircraft cooling needs? I have no idea regarding the authors 
>> credentials, and I no longer monitor PL's "newsletter".. I was 
>> curious more than anything else... Pauls reaction, others 
>> reactions, etc.
>>
>> Translation.. yes.. I'm stirring the pot/Trolling... I figure if 
>> we are using NACA's on the Velocity, that makes us somewhat of a 
>> NACA supporter..
>>
>> Dave
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster