X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from www.whiteaspen.com ([66.180.170.33] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 1029051 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:45:25 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.180.170.33; envelope-from=sladerj@bellsouth.net Received: from [10.101.1.10] (unknown [10.101.1.10]) by www.whiteaspen.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB6BB8016 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2006 22:44:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4410F625.9050109@bellsouth.net> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 22:44:37 -0500 From: John Slade User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] NACA's, Cooling and Sport Aviation Mag.. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dave, My only cooling intake is the plans Cozy IV NACA. Cooling has never been a problem. Regards, John David Staten wrote: > At the risk of invoking PL's name, anyone else read this months Sport > Aviation mag from EAA, and notice an article on cooling that seems to > indicate that NACA's are acceptable and adequate for aircraft cooling > needs? I have no idea regarding the authors credentials, and I no > longer monitor PL's "newsletter".. I was curious more than anything > else... Pauls reaction, others reactions, etc. > > Translation.. yes.. I'm stirring the pot/Trolling... I figure if we > are using NACA's on the Velocity, that makes us somewhat of a NACA > supporter.. > > Dave > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >