X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 1028993 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:21:31 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=Dastaten@earthlink.net Received: from user-0cetj34.cable.mindspring.com ([24.238.204.100] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FHXFI-0006wN-94 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:20:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4410E20C.1080708@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:18:52 -0600 From: David Staten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA's, Cooling and Sport Aviation Mag.. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 9a30bff84e6cb88f95c85d38d22416599ef193a6bfc3dd4850a5ca3bed732f67c4124eb4214e3d5e133ed92d71017c35350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.238.204.100 I skimmed it.. Chris and I are actually considering armpit scoops for cooling, but we still have this nagging urge to minimize deviations from plans. I will go back and do more than just skim.. All I saw was NACA's, Cooling and immediately thought of PL.. Dave Bulent Aliev wrote: > You are right Bill. David did not read the whole article. Or he > didn't want to hear it? :) > Buly > > > > On Mar 9, 2006, at 8:58 PM, Bill Dube wrote: > >> I read that article as well. I had the same skepticism about the >> NACA intake for cooling. My understanding is that with an NACA >> inlet, you don't get the ram pressure you need to force air through >> a high fin-count radiator. Am I wrong about this? >> >> Bill Dube' >> >> David Staten wrote: >> >>> At the risk of invoking PL's name, anyone else read this months >>> Sport Aviation mag from EAA, and notice an article on cooling that >>> seems to indicate that NACA's are acceptable and adequate for >>> aircraft cooling needs? I have no idea regarding the authors >>> credentials, and I no longer monitor PL's "newsletter".. I was >>> curious more than anything else... Pauls reaction, others >>> reactions, etc. >>> >>> Translation.. yes.. I'm stirring the pot/Trolling... I figure if we >>> are using NACA's on the Velocity, that makes us somewhat of a NACA >>> supporter.. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> -- >>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >>> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >>> >> >> -- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >