X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.62] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 1028953 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:37:16 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.62; envelope-from=Dastaten@earthlink.net Received: from user-0cetj34.cable.mindspring.com ([24.238.204.100] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FHWYR-0000mz-RZ for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:36:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4410D7A8.1010706@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:34:32 -0600 From: David Staten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: NACA's, Cooling and Sport Aviation Mag.. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 9a30bff84e6cb88f95c85d38d22416599ef193a6bfc3dd4850a5ca3bed732f678d99c0e3f1696290387f7b89c61deb1d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 24.238.204.100 At the risk of invoking PL's name, anyone else read this months Sport Aviation mag from EAA, and notice an article on cooling that seems to indicate that NACA's are acceptable and adequate for aircraft cooling needs? I have no idea regarding the authors credentials, and I no longer monitor PL's "newsletter".. I was curious more than anything else... Pauls reaction, others reactions, etc. Translation.. yes.. I'm stirring the pot/Trolling... I figure if we are using NACA's on the Velocity, that makes us somewhat of a NACA supporter.. Dave