X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [201.225.225.167] (HELO cwpanama.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 972536 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:53:26 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.167; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend1.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 59464478 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:04:58 -0500 Message-ID: <000701c62b67$b28f9d20$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Rusty's Single Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:52:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 George, bring it on!! there is never anything boring on this list!! Especially if it is about Rotaries - the torque and balance issues on the 1-Rotor are interesting! Bring it on! Thomas Jakits ----- Original Message ----- From: "george lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 4:36 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Rusty's Single > Hi Fred - where have you been, I hadn't seen comments from you recently! > > Rusty purchased the single as a 'completed engine' so might not know the > different weights. > > I have some updated info on the single and balancing if you need it. > > Do you remember we were discussing the merits of different placement of the > single rotor oiling cooling jet -well that's all sorted! > > When I get mine done I will give you all the details but it depends on what > rotor you are using ( and it's internal volume). > > I won't go into details here and bore everyone with a lengthy discussion on > the single - contact me directly. > > George (down under) > lendich@optusnet.com.au > > > Rusty, > > > > I would be interested to learn what you did to balance your single > > rotor. Did you add weight to the counterweights? > > Were the counterweights the only "flywheel" in this latest smooooth run? > > > > Fred O. > > > > > Well, there's certainly nothing wrong with the balance of the single > > > rotor parts, because it's smooooooth as can be now that the redrive > > > and prop are gone. Below 1800 or so, there's some shake from the lack > > > of flywheel weight, but it runs down to 1000 rpm or so without being > > > too bad. Above 2000, up to 6000 rpm, it's true rotary smooth. I > > > guess I just need a redrive with a suitable dampener now, but that's > > > not going to be any sort of priority until the RV-8 is done. > > > Unfortunately, that kit was delayed, and I won't even get it until the > > > first of March. > > > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/