Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #30011
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Single rotor smooth as silk now
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:18:51 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Richard Sohn wrote:


    Hi Rusty,
         let me throw something in here on the dampener. Tracy's dampener
    is not built to take up a lot of torque vibration at low rpm. What
    we need on the single is having the soft elements closer to the
    center line of the e-shaft, allowing more movement in them, eg.
    having a softer coupling = lower resonant frequency, and at the
    same time utilizing some of the dampening characteristics
    inherrent in the rubber. The closest to that requrement I could
    come up with, is the do-nut shaped coupler used on Rotax and Hirth
    engines. They are also available in different Shore values. I have
    not found a US source yet.
    I have not demonstrated yet if this solution is sufficient, but
    analysis indicates that, if the idle speed is 1500rpm or above, it
    should be ok.
    All this does not eliminate the careful selction of a sufficient
    fly wheel.
         Richard Sohn
    N-2071U
     
There are two ways to avoid resonance.  Drive out all the play in the system, putting the resonant frequency above the operating range, or add a lot of play, putting resonance below idle.  The Powersport guys tried the former, driving the redrive cost beyond resonable.  But that was with a two rotor.  Would a single with no dampers put the resonance beyond the useful range?

--
        ,|"|"|,               Ernest Christley     |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----     Dyke Delta Builder    |
       o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster