X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [201.225.225.167] (HELO cwpanama.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 971534 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 20:19:57 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.167; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend1.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 59389139 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:31:20 -0500 Message-ID: <004f01c62abb$4f6778f0$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Single rotor smooth as silk now Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:19:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004B_01C62A91.663BAFD0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C62A91.663BAFD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MessageGood news Rusty, off-topic, but you were battling it for some time: I don't know wether you sent this original message with gmail or bellsucks - just for your leisure thoughts ( when you get them offthe single rotor....): I received George's reply to your email at 18:10 local - I received your original email at 19:03 local....... Thomas J. ----- Original Message ----- From: george lendich To: Rotary motors in aircraft Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 5:49 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Single rotor smooth as silk now Rusty, Really good news, you might get Tracy to supply some alternative rubber isolators - probably harder ones? but I'm guessing! George ( down under) Greetings, Well, there's certainly nothing wrong with the balance of the single rotor parts, because it's smooooooth as can be now that the redrive and prop are gone. Below 1800 or so, there's some shake from the lack of flywheel weight, but it runs down to 1000 rpm or so without being too bad. Above 2000, up to 6000 rpm, it's true rotary smooth. I guess I just need a redrive with a suitable dampener now, but that's not going to be any sort of priority until the RV-8 is done. Unfortunately, that kit was delayed, and I won't even get it until the first of March. Cheers, Rusty (you may now return to Evan's bashing) ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C62A91.663BAFD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Good news Rusty,
 
off-topic, but you were battling it for some=20 time:
 
I don't know wether you sent this original = message with=20 gmail or bellsucks - just for your leisure thoughts ( when you get them = offthe=20 single rotor....):
I received George's reply to your email at 18:10 = local -=20
I received your original email at 19:03=20 local.......
 
Thomas J.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 george=20 lendich
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 = 5:49=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Single = rotor=20 smooth as silk now

Rusty,
Really good news, you might get Tracy = to supply=20 some alternative rubber isolators - probably harder ones? but I'm=20 guessing!
George ( down under)
Greetings,
 
Well, = there's certainly=20 nothing wrong with the balance of the single rotor parts, because = it's=20 smooooooth as can be now that the redrive and prop are gone.  = Below=20 1800 or so, there's some shake from the lack of flywheel weight, but = it runs=20 down to 1000 rpm or so without being too bad.  Above 2000, up = to 6000=20 rpm, it's true rotary smooth.  I guess I just need a = redrive=20 with a suitable dampener now, but that's not going to be any sort of = priority until the RV-8 is done.  Unfortunately, that kit was = delayed,=20 and I won't even get it until the first of March.  =
 
Cheers,
Rusty = (you may now return=20 to Evan's bashing)
 
 
<= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01C62A91.663BAFD0--