X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([216.148.227.151] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 916654 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 12:44:52 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.151; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <2006010717440801300ddl2te>; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:44:08 +0000 Message-ID: <017701c613b1$f30de0f0$057ba8c0@farr.com> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Why rubber engine mounts? Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:44:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 30 year rule. (Always been done that way.) ? jofarr, soddy tn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott" > If our engines are smooth and the entire engine is > well balanced, why is it necessary to isolate the > engine from the engine mount/airframe?