X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from ninemile.uwyo.edu ([129.72.10.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 866021 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:11:10 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.72.10.29; envelope-from=sboese@uwyo.edu Received: from UWMAIL.uwyo.edu (uwmail.uwyo.edu [172.26.4.76]) by ninemile.uwyo.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB6NAB6g016662 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:10:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from sboese@uwyo.edu) Received: from Boesexps ([10.4.40.69]) by UWMAIL.uwyo.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:10:23 -0700 From: "sboese" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: fuel system issues Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:09:43 -0700 Message-ID: <007d01c5faba$24945890$4528040a@gg.uwyo.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 2005 23:10:23.0644 (UTC) FILETIME=[3C899DC0:01C5FABA] Thanks Todd, Rusty, and Al for the responses to my fuel system concerns. Todd=92s observation that the capacitive fuel gauge indications are = reliable when the tanks are near empty is what I needed to hear. I took Rusty=92s suggestion and investigated the source of the bubbles = in the fuel lines further. When the high pressure fuel pump in the plane is running, there are no bubbles between the tank and the pump, no bubbles = in the fuel rail or lines between the pump and the pressure regulator, and there are bubbles in the return line between the pressure regulator and = the wing tank. As a separate test, I connected a fuel pressure regulator to = the RX7 donor car=92s fuel tank which was filled with fuel and had the = original submerged fuel pump in it with a clean inlet sock. Running the pump in = this setup gave the same results: bubbles in the return line, but nowhere = else. Al=92s suggestion is probably correct that the bubbles are air which was originally dissolved in the fuel rather than fuel vapor as I had = originally thought. Fuel vapor should rapidly recondense, but redissolving the air into the fuel would probably be a slower process, thus the bubbles = persist. Using the submerged fuel pump as he recommended did not change what was observed, but still is a good idea for the reasons he stated. =20 I don=92t think there is a problem when the fuel is returned to the = large wing tank where it would be unlikely for the bubbles to get into the line supplying the pump. It could be an issue, however, if the fuel is = returned to a smaller header tank depending on how the header tank is constructed = and vented. If the fuel is recirculated long enough, and if the bubbles are really = air; the dissolved air should be eventually nearly eliminated from the = system, but I didn't run the pump long enough to see if this is true. I = haven=92t tried the tests with avgas, either. My apologies to the list if this is common knowledge. =20 Steve Boese, WY, RV6A, 13B NA, EC2, RD1A =20 =A0