Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <4393A730.9000408@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 21:34:24 -0500
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Tracy's RD-1C measurements.
References: <list-863205@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-863205@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

rijakits wrote:

>Ernest,
>
>I think you are wrong.....
>I have Outlook Express as well and never had any problems with it.
>I did have a lot of trouble though with ISP, wrongly configured firewalls,
>etc...
>
>  
>

Nope.  Unfortunately, I know whereof I speak on this particular issue.  
I've been working at Cisco and subscribed to their Linux users internal 
mail list. The corporate IT has made a executive decision to change to 
the Microsoft mail system, and I've been privy to a constant barrage of 
email from irate network engineers detailing to the greatest degree how 
the headers are used inappropriately.  I must admit, that I use the 
'need' to read it all as an excuse not to do real work later in the day 
when I'm just wore out.

YMMV and all other standard disclaimers apply.

>I understand peoples dislike of MS products, but Outlook Express has
>probably nothing to do with this problem.
>  
>
The key word is 'probably'.  It's all in who is trying to talk to who at 
which point. 

-- 
This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against
instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make
mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their
decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)."