X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [201.225.225.169] (HELO cwpanama.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c5) with ESMTP id 774112 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:44:40 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=201.225.225.169; envelope-from=rijakits@cwpanama.net Received: from [201.224.93.110] (HELO usuarioq3efog0) by frontend3.cwpanama.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 50205641 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 19:00:46 -0500 Message-ID: <002e01c5d506$d4ecdca0$6e5de0c9@usuarioq3efog0> From: "rijakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA scoops Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:42:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Ernest, just really busy now, but there is a good website with a builder who did a lot of modificacion to the NACA to make it work - I'll find it and forward, also on the quote from the NACA-inventors. Thomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 9:05 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: NACA scoops > rijakits wrote: > > > > > Remember the inventors of the NACA-duct did recommend to NOT use > > it as a pressure-recovery intake (what we need for our our car > > style radiators) > > > I've heard this repeated so many times, and yet I've never been able to > find the report that said it. I believe it is well on its way to > becoming an old-wives-tale. I've looked for a while in vain to find the > exact quote this morning, but the closest I've been able to find was > more along the lines of "we didn't test that, so we don't recommend it." > > "We don't recommend it, because we haven't tested it" is NOT the same > as, "we don't recommend it because we found it doesn't work." > > All of the reports are online at naca.larc.nasa.gov. That address > starts you at the search page. 'submerged inlet' brings up the reports > on NACA scoops, with the most germaine for our purposes being located > at http://naca.larc.nasa.gov/reports/1951/naca-tn-2323/ . I'll keep > looking for the quote I'm referring to above, but I would really > appreciate a pointer to the report that says, "We found submerged inlets > to be deficient for use with radiators." > > -- > ,|"|"|, | > ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | > o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org | > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/