X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net ([204.127.202.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c5) with ESMTP id 771320 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:51:43 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.64; envelope-from=jesse@jessfarr.com Received: from office5 (pcp04959909pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net[68.59.199.44]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2005101721505201300l3123e>; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 21:50:53 +0000 Message-ID: <01b901c5d364$d129e020$057ba8c0@farr.com> From: "jesse farr" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Displacement - Again? Timing of the Work Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:50:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Now why did I not read this before my earlier comment; I even agree with most of what Doug says. I think. I like it. (yeah, six strokes/cylces, four cycles/strokes, a bunch of ignitions, all of that; yeah that 's the ticket, dazzle 'em with brilliance or baffle 'em with bs {basic science}.) jofarr, soddy tn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Mueller" > > "The rotary engine is a 6 stroke internal combustion engine. I know, > people > will probably start screaming at me for this so let's get into a little > explanation as to why and how typical mathematical formulas for piston > engines don't work. > 2 stroke engine (up, down) - 1 complete crankshaft revolution. > 4 stroke engine (up, down, up, down) - 2 complete crankshaft revolutions. > 6 stroke (rotary) engine (up, down, up, down, up, down) - 3 complete > crankshaft (eccentric shaft) revolutions. > See a pattern? All of these engines though are still 4 cycle engines! They > are > different stroke engines though so the amount of work they do per time is > very different. A 2 stroke engine does twice the work per amount of time > that > a 4 stroke does. Don't believe me? Go race 2-80cc motorcycles, 1-2 stroke > and 1-4 stroke and see who wins! This must mean that the rotary engine > does the least amount of work per time than both other engine types. Yes > it > does. But, unlike a piston engine, it uses 3 sides of it's piston (rotor) > at a > time. In reality it makes no difference if we have 1 rotor with 3 usable > faces or > 6 rotors with 1 usable face each as in a piston engine.