Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.15.58.72; envelope-from=bob@bob-white.com
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:21:58 -0600
From: Bob White <bob@bob-white.com>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: flyrotary_Web_Archive Re: Banishment
Message-Id: <20051016192158.4b273c82.bob@bob-white.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-770355@logan.com>
References: <list-770355@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Dave,

OK, one revolution of the e-shaft is 1/3 revolution of the rotors. So
each rotor has had one intake event.  Each face has a calculated
displacement of about 650 cc.  Two X 650 cc = 1.3L.  If you can explain
why it's 2.6L, maybe I can send Paul an apology.  Or are you just
trying to get my goat? :)

I'm not trying to create a big discussion on the displacement of the
rotary, I just want to understand where that 2.6L per revolution number
is comming from.  I haven't been able to see it.  I think Paul gets it
from comparing to a piston engine, and I agree that the 13B compares
closest to a 2.6L 4 cycle 4 cylinder engine.

Bob W.


On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:27:59 -0700
David Leonard <wdleonard@gmail.com> wrote:

> Monty, Glad to have you and you know you will always be welcome here.
> However, you are wrong and 'he' is right about the displacement of the 13B.
> It is 2.6L or 159.6 cubic inches to be more exact.
>  That is the volume of intake on one revolution of the e-shaft.
>  But I think you knew that, you were just trying to get his goat. ;-)
> 
> --
> Dave Leonard
> Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY
> http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html
> http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html
> 
>  On 10/16/05, Monty Roberts <montyr2157@alltel.net> wrote:
> >
> > The doctrine of immaculate ingestion. Whereby molecules of air and fuel
> > magically migrate into a very small, very perfect engine,unsullied by the
> > mere laws of physics, thereby creating the salvation of the world through
> > massive power levels.
> >  In the protestant tradition of placing the individual at the front of the
> > line rather than at the bottom of the church hierarchy, I will henceforth
> > place all replies at the TOP of each post.
> >  Monty
> >   Which doctrine was that Monty?
> >
> > Bob W.
> >
> >
> 


-- 
http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)
Prewired EC2 Cables - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/