X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 711770 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:41:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.167; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3701358220 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167]) by filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03247-06-83 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (70-98-143-148.dsl1.csv.tn.frontiernet.net [70.98.143.148]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77ADE3581D9 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <431C677C.3070508@frontiernet.net> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 10:42:52 -0500 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Another great flying day = another day of troubleshooting References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0536-0, 09/05/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net <... very small plug gap can help the problem. I use .010" to .012" on both ...> Wouldn't using hotter plugs help? Wouldn't that "burn" the lead deposits off? How about CD ignition? doesn't that have a really short rise time? There's gotta' be a better way than changing plugs more often than oil ... Jim S. Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/5/2005 12:31:18 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > wdleonard@gmail.com writes: > > Regarding SAG - my analysis is that susceptibility to SAG is > proportional to combustion chamber pressure at ignition and > the condition of the plugs. The more pressure - the harder it > is for the spark to jump the gap, so if your plugs are getting > coated with lead/carbon, I would expect to see more SAG with > More manifold pressure. Tracy and I have found the same thing > (unturboed). At high power setting (higher manifold pressure) > the problem becomes more aggravated. Reducing throttle > setting helped - but, replacing (perhaps cleaning the spark > plug center ceramic cone) is the cure. I must have a fortune > in little-used spark plugs setting around waiting for me to > have nothing else to do but clean spark plugs {:>). > > > Ok, that fits except for the fact that at increasing altitudes, > the MAP at which the SAG occurred was lower (eg. 36" at s.l. but > only 26" at 10k'). So something else is involved but I don't > know what. Time to order more spark plugs. :-) > > You folks are not old enough to remember this, but, you used to take > your plugs to the local gas station where there was a Champion plug > tester/cleaner. This thing had a high voltage source and a window in > it so you could watch the plug gap while increasing air pressure > around the plug. When dirty, the pressure could not be increased much > at all before the arc would go out. > > You then let out the pressurized air and pushed a button that would > sand blast the plug tip. > You then repeated the test to find that full available pressure would > not stop the arc. > > In the rotary there is another problem. The mixture is moving past the > leading plug at the speed of a rifle bullet. The fact that it lights > at all is amazing. The trailing plug is in a little room by itself, > with the fuel air mixture filling in around it much like a piston > engine. This is much more likely to work than the leading plug situation. > > When you loose a leading plug, you know right away. About a 15% to 20% > power loss. You can loose a trailing plug and not notice it. About 5% > power loss. > > In a Kettering style system, the coil is charged up to 12 volts and to > fire, the primary voltage is removed (electronically or by a set of > points opening) to allow a field collapse an a high voltage (based on > windings ratio) to be generated. > > It will soon be the case that there will be no vehicle left on earth > that uses the Kettering system, because of the pollution and/or fuel > consumption problems. > > The field collapse system in electrical terms is very slow. The > secondary (high) voltage develops slowly, and this allows time for a > path of flow to develop around the plug gap. > This what you are feeling in the SAG. Once a path of carbon is > established, there is not sufficient voltage left in the parallel path > to jump the plug gap. > > A high energy system that has a very short rise time, eliminates the > problem. > > Also a very small plug gap can help the problem. I use .010" to .012" > on both leading and trailing plugs with an MSD on both systems. One > set of plugs per year. No problems up to 10,000 RPM. > > Lynn E. Hanover > > > >