X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail19.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.200] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTPS id 700469 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 17:34:16 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.200; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d58-104-232-31.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [58.104.232.31]) by mail19.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j82LXKuY020597 for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2005 07:33:24 +1000 Message-ID: <002f01c5b006$3463df60$1fe8683a@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: "O" rings/ Exhaust flanges Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 07:35:12 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002C_01C5B05A.04936180" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C5B05A.04936180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lynn, I did a check a cross section on them to see that there is sufficient = space for expansion. Also Creavey checked the sizes in a Housing sent by Kelly. Indications are that they don't need additional torque and the cross = sections are the same, therefore so is the crush. =20 George ( down under) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lehanover@aol.com=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 9:48 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "O" rings/ Exhaust flanges In a message dated 9/2/2005 12:01:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time, = lendich@optusnet.com.au writes: Lynn,=20 I would say my "O"rings fit pretty well and that's the Cosmo Rotor = Housing - see photo. Bill, I would say my exhaust flange fits pretty well - see photo. George ( down under) Very nice work. Did anyone check to see how close to hydrauliced the "O" rings are in = the groove? Are they stiff enough to require any additional torque on the case = bolts? Lynn E. Hanover ------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C5B05A.04936180 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lynn,
I did a check a cross section on them to see that there = is=20 sufficient space for expansion.
Also Creavey checked the sizes in a Housing sent by Kelly.
 
Indications are that they don't need additional torque and the = cross=20 sections are the same, therefore so is the crush. 
George ( down under)
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Lehanover@aol.com
Sent: Friday, September 02, = 2005 9:48=20 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: "O" = rings/=20 Exhaust flanges

In a message dated 9/2/2005 12:01:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time, lendich@optusnet.com.au=20 writes:
Lynn,
I would say my "O"rings fit pretty = well and=20 that's the Cosmo Rotor Housing - see photo.
Bill,
I would say my exhaust flange fits = pretty well=20 - see photo.
George ( down=20 under)


Very nice work.
 
Did anyone check to see how close to hydrauliced the "O" rings = are in the=20 groove?
 
Are they stiff enough to require any additional torque on the = case=20 bolts?
 
Lynn E. Hanover
------=_NextPart_000_002C_01C5B05A.04936180--