Return-Path: Received: from fed1mtao05.cox.net ([68.6.19.126] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1) with ESMTP id 2522219 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:14:10 -0400 Received: from Leonards ([68.8.0.240]) by fed1mtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20030813161410.YLWH23215.fed1mtao05.cox.net@Leonards> for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:14:10 -0400 From: "David Leonard" To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Injectors Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:14:14 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c361b5$f079e100$f0000844@Leonards> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 I'm in the same boat as you, Al. Although I'm running a turbo it seems that I will need the MAP reference version for sure. Do you have the contact at TWM who said they would give you credit? Will the MAP version fit in the same fuel rail as the non-map version? Thanks, David Leonard The Rotary Roster: http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On > Behalf Of Al Gietzen > Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 8:11 AM > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Subject: [FlyRotary] Injectors > > > > BTW, how did switching the primary & secondary injectors work out for > easing > the step from 2 to 4 injectors at stagging point? > > Tracy > > Hasn't been tried yet. Still working on engine installation on the > airplane, and expect it will be months yet until I run the engine again. > It does look like my wiring harness will work for the switch. > > The staging point wasn't the main issue; it was excessively rich at low > speed (low MAP), a combination of the larger primary injectors, and a > constant pressure fuel pressure regulator. I spoke with TWM Induction > yesterday, and they seemed amenable to allowing me to return the > regulator for credit toward the version with MAP reference. The MAP > referenced regulator is about $100 more. > > By the way, he did concur that the MAP referenced version is generally > used for turbo application. Perhaps your EC-2 specs should mention that > the base mapping assumes MAP referenced pressure regulator (that is > true, right?) for us NA guys that got constant pressure regulators. > > I haven't made the final decision on whether to get lower flow > primaries, but it seems it will require changing the fuel rail since > apparently there aren't any lower flow injectors that can go into the > stock side-feed 20B rail. > > Al > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html