X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail.theofficenet.com ([65.166.240.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.4) with SMTP id 988060 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:57:03 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.166.240.5; envelope-from=jackoford@theofficenet.com Received: (qmail 26525 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2005 01:55:29 -0000 Received: from dpc691941229.direcpc.com (HELO jack) (69.19.41.229) by mail.theofficenet.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 2005 01:55:29 -0000 Message-ID: <011b01c56bcd$0be40dd0$6501a8c0@jack> From: "Jack Ford" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: risk reduction methods Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:54:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 In-tank, Ernest, not intake. Jack ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernest Christley" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 6:43 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: risk reduction methods > al p wick wrote: > > > When you have any theory, you need to find a way to convert that to > > facts. This is profound. You see, we don't do that naturally. We are > > very comfortable making decisions entirely based on theory. Theory are > > thoughts. Facts are numbers. We need to distinguish the two. > > > Go back in the archives and look at the experiments on electric water > pumps set up by Bob White (I think it was Bob). Long discussion > concerning things like what will temperature do to viscosity of coolant > and what that will do to the flow rate, followed by valiant effort to > turn theories into facts which left us all with real world numbers. > Then there's Rusty who has both a mechanical pump and an EWP installed > so that he can safely run test. And then there is Ed, who has done some > incredible work with intake tuning with variable length intakes. It is > simply not true that we run around spouting theory without building and > testing the same. I hear that is done on another list, but I have no > firsthand knowledge of it. > > BTW, Rusty, if you're listening, I think I know where I went wrong in > interpretting that French guy. Viscosity does decrease with temperature > at some mathematical deterministic rate that I have written down > somewhere, but Mother Nature works in Kelvin, not Farenheit or Celcius. > The small margin seen in the experiment makes perfect sense when you > take that little bit of information into account. (90 to 180 isn't > doubled if those numbers are really 570 and 660). > > > So I provided a great example of the Subaru timing chain defect. Can > > you find a way to convert those concepts to your aircraft? If you can, > > you are on the path. > > > I don't know. Replace stuff before it breaks? Replace all the soft > parts every 5yrs? (You'll find me recommending this at some time in the > not to distant past.) > > > Let's take a real world example. Your fuel delivery system. How do you > > know the distance between it and failure? Vapor lock failure is at one > > end of a curve. We want to be as far as possible from that end. How do > > you know that distance? Right now we use theory. We guess. But you > > don't have to guess. You can easily measure your safety margin. There > > are many simple tricks to measuring all of your safety margins. Not > > just this item. > > > If you have a method of measuring the potential for vapor lock, then a > lot of people will be beating a path to your door. I'll be amoung > them. So far I'm just hearing you say that we should measure the > unmeasurable. If all it takes is a few simple tricks then I don't think > there would be as many accidents as there are now. > > > > > Of course, I'm assuming that there are users who are unable to install > > intank pumps. After all, those pumps do virtually eliminate all vapor > > lock risk. > > > Intake pump? Please, please define intake pump. > > -- > This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against > instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make > mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their > decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html > >