X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from tomcat.al.noaa.gov ([140.172.240.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.3) with ESMTP id 970505 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:41:37 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=140.172.240.2; envelope-from=bdube@al.noaa.gov Received: from mungo.al.noaa.gov (mungo.al.noaa.gov [140.172.241.126]) by tomcat.al.noaa.gov (8.12.11/8.12.0) with ESMTP id j4VHerAN029169 for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:40:53 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20050531113647.032fabc8@mailsrvr.al.noaa.gov> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:40:02 -0600 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" From: Bill Dube Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RX-8 6 port Intake - Like, complicated.... In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 12:15 AM 5/31/2005, you wrote: >Bill, >There is some one currently tuning a 2" intake - I think 16" may be a little >short. How did you measure the length e.g. centre of diameter? They are quite twisty. I tried my best to measure the equivalent of the centerline distance. Probably plus or minus an inch. >What diameter is the 16" primary runners. They look about an inch and a quarter ID. I didn't measure them, however. >What is the diameter of all the other runners. The others are similar in diameter. Perhaps a touch smaller. >Diameter may help in guesstimating the runner length i.e. reduced diameter = >increased velocity. I'll measure the ID tonight. Bill Dube'