X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.72] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2) with ESMTP id 968230 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 May 2005 17:09:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.72; envelope-from=ceengland@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm68aec.bellsouth.net ([209.215.61.157]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050530210839.YVCG26489.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm68aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 17:08:39 -0400 Received: from [209.215.61.157] by ibm68aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050530210838.XSTP29052.ibm68aec.bellsouth.net@[209.215.61.157]> for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 17:08:38 -0400 Message-ID: <429B80DD.2000906@bellsouth.net> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 16:08:45 -0500 From: Charlie England User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: will EFI pumps pump air References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Agreed; that's why I said that it's not my favorite choice. :-) One possible way around that is to just use the selector valve as a roll trim device & never remove your hand unless it is pointed at the main tank. Ultimate emptying of the aux tank(s) could/should be done while at cruise altitude & within gliding distance of a landing zone, anyway, because you've just eliminated any 'plan B'. My personal preference is to have 2 options late in the flight if I have plenty of fuel & to have it all in one tank if (due to no fault of my own, of course...) fuel quantity is marginal as I approach my destination. Of course, *any* tank switching/transfer method has it's downsides. Tracy's method (which I think is fine, overall) has the downside of no plan B if there's a problem with blockage, contamination etc with the primary supply tank. Anyone care to start a spreadsheet with various fuel system architectures & their upsides, downsides, failure modes, etc? This would be an ideal thing to put on Bob's wiki. That way it can be updated as we see fit & we can each evaluate the risks & benefits & 'pick our poison'. Charlie William wrote: > Be careful with the system of pumping from one tank and returning to > the other. With the flow rates that an EFI pump returns to the tank, > it would require very active tank managment to avoid sucking the one > tank dry. this caused an engine out/off field landing for the > prototype Pulsar 100 a few years back. > > Bill Schertz > KIS Cruiser # 4045 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Russell Duffy > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 2:45 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: will EFI pumps pump air > > One thing I'm considering is to just use the regular pumps to transfer > fuel. If you plumb the tanks to a fuel selector, then when you select > the aux side the excess flow will end up in what's now your primary > tank. > > This is probably a step better than having one pump per tank. The > only negative I see is not being able to run the tank out without > killing the engine. With all the tanks you're talking about > having, that's probably not a big deal, but the RV-3 only has two > 15 gallon tanks, so using every last gallon is useful (if I ever > went anywhere). > > I've seen the 1st idea work in certified planes; the 2nd idea is wild > speculation. > > Thanks, but I have enough wild speculation of my own :-) > > Charlie > (Wish you could have made it up here this weekend; if you get bored & > need a place to fly come on up for lunch sometime.) > > Roger. It might happen some day. > > Rusty > > >