X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2) with ESMTP id 967496 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 29 May 2005 18:30:44 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.29; envelope-from=dale.r@cox.net Received: from smtp.west.cox.net ([172.18.180.52]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050529222959.TDZN20235.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 18:29:59 -0400 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.15 (webedge20-101-1103-20040528) From: Dale Rogers To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fuel Tank Selection (was: Paul's Fuel System Error) Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:29:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20050529222959.TDZN20235.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@smtp.west.cox.net> Bill, Thank you for that clarification. When I read Perry's comments, I was wondering "why?" - because the system I'm building has the functions: Left, Right, Both, None. Now I'm not so worried, because each high pressure fuel pump draws from it's own tank and the only point of inter- connection is where the lines join at the fuel rail(s). I borrowed the basis of my setup from Marc and Nadine Parmalee's COZY: http://www.marcnadine.com/fuelvalve.html Dale R. > From: "BillDube@killacycle.com" > Date: 2005/05/29 Sun AM 02:03:31 EDT > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Paul's Fuel System Error > > About a year ago I did a little "Google" research on the John > Denver fatal crash. The bottom line appeared to be that one tank was empty, > and the fuel selector was not fully turned to the other tank. (It was in a > very awkward position to reach, and this may have also caused the pilot to > auger in while attempting to reach it.) Thus, it was in the equivalent of a > "both" position. This caused air to be drawn in to the fuel supply line > from the dry tank. This, in turn, caused the pump to lose its prime and > stop pumping fuel to the engine. > > As Perry mentions in his post, only a gravity feed fuel system can > have a "both" type fuel selector. Low-wing aircraft that have negative > pressure in the fuel lines from the tanks must NOT have a "both" position > on the fuel selector, otherwise the pump (or the sump) will suck air if one > tank runs dry (or if there is a leak in a fuel line.) > > This kind of makes you want to put a pump in each tank. > > > > At 06:56 PM 5/28/2005, you wrote: > >Rotary Enthusiasts: > > > >I have not had time to keep up with the message traffic on this list in > >real time. But I did take some time this weekend to search the archives > >for clues to Paul Conner's accident. I found he made a major mistake in > >his fuel system. It does not mean this was the cause of the accident, but > >it's possible. I want to make sure no other Canarders out there do > >something similar. > > > >Attached are two pictures from the Long-EZ plans. You see the fuel system > >is a low-wing fuel system, like a Piper. Pipers and other low wing > >aircraft do not use a L-R-BOTH-OFF fuel selector valve, they only use > >L-R-OFF. Only high wing Cessna's use the L-R-BOTH-OFF system. > > > >Here is the link to the message where Paul says he uses a L-R-BOTH and > >normally runs on BOTH. He says he did that on his previous Long-EZ as > >well, but that also was an error. > > Bill Dube > http://www.killacycle.com/Lights.htm