X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <Dastaten@earthlink.net>
Received: from smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2)
  with ESMTP id 966246 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 May 2005 22:51:42 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=Dastaten@earthlink.net
Received: from [24.238.206.157] (helo=earthlink.net)
	by smtpauth09.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DbrPc-0006c6-6t
	for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 May 2005 22:50:56 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple;
  s=test1; d=earthlink.net;
  h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=N2aOF5EYCQaW8NDUcRyLPZy7EpGX6kwQEZEXIjb0627I4mCLxUrpBGoBH8wFhj7a;
Message-ID: <4297DBCC.2080203@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 21:47:40 -0500
From: David Staten <Dastaten@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Why insist on a sump?
References: <list-966241@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-966241@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 9a30bff84e6cb88f95c85d38d22416599ef193a6bfc3dd48114fd0f56a4379f9dd40196d6756611787b2572753744e27350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 24.238.206.157

The reason for the sump in my case is that it is "per plans". While 
experimenting is wonderful, there is usually a reason for the way the 
plans were made the way they were.. That being said.. Per plans didnt 
include the rotary engine, but there are fuel injected aviation engines 
out there and I presume some have return type fuel systems.
 
Dave