Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #22660
From: Bulent Aliev <atlasyts@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank - Velocity version
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:24:11 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank - Velocity version On 5/27/05 1:14 PM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>There are several down sides to returning fuel to the sump (aggrivated
>quite a bit as the size of the sump decreases).

Don't know where this comes from? My sump is only 1 gallon and contains two
fuel pumps. Never had an issue with fuel return to the sump in 520 hours now. I had a minor problem at one time with sump vent placement. Had a potential
major problem once when I had the sump vent temporarily plugged - BIG NO-NO!

Perry

 
This is a perfect example of why it's going to be virtually impossible to come up with a list of practices that we "know" will, or won't work.  

Rusty (yes Al, we WILL talk about you while you're gone <g>)



That’s why we need PL :)
Buly
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster