X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2) with ESMTP id 965529 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:25:00 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.67; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm60aec.bellsouth.net ([67.32.133.236]) by imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050527172413.VGXP5762.imf19aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm60aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:24:13 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.102] (really [67.32.133.236]) by ibm60aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050527172412.EVWQ7767.ibm60aec.bellsouth.net@[192.168.2.102]> for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:24:12 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:24:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank - Velocity version From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3200045052_1096140" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3200045052_1096140 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On 5/27/05 1:14 PM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >There are several down sides to returning fuel to the sump (aggrivated >> >quite a bit as the size of the sump decreases). >=20 > Don't know where this comes from? My sump is only 1 gallon and contains t= wo > fuel pumps. Never had an issue with fuel return to the sump in 520 hours = now. > I had a minor problem at one time with sump vent placement. Had a potenti= al > major problem once when I had the sump vent temporarily plugged - BIG NO-= NO! >=20 > Perry >=20 > =20 > This is a perfect example of why it's going to be virtually impossible to= come > up with a list of practices that we "know" will, or won't work. > =20 > Rusty (yes Al, we WILL talk about you while you're gone ) >=20 >=20 That=B9s why we need PL :) Buly --B_3200045052_1096140 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank - Velocity version On 5/= 27/05 1:14 PM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote:=

>There are several down sides to returning fuel to t= he sump (aggrivated
>quite a bit as the size of the sump decreases).

Don't know where this comes from? My sump is only 1 gallon and contains two=
fuel pumps. Never had an issue with fuel return to the sump in 520 hours no= w. I had a minor problem at one time with sump vent placement. Had a potenti= al
major problem once when I had the sump vent temporarily plugged - BIG NO-NO= !

Perry

 
This is a perfect example of why it's going to be = virtually impossible to come up with a list of practices that we "know&= quot; will, or won't work.  
Rusty (yes Al, we WILL talk about you while you're= gone <g>)



That’s why we need PL :)
Buly
 --B_3200045052_1096140--