X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2) with ESMTP id 965521 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:15:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.71; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm66aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050527171445.DYQF8541.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm66aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:14:45 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm66aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20050527171445.GMDO5308.ibm66aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 13:14:45 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank - Velocity version Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 12:14:54 -0500 Message-ID: <005501c562df$99e4b9a0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0056_01C562B5.B10EB1A0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C562B5.B10EB1A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >There are several down sides to returning fuel to the sump (aggrivated >quite a bit as the size of the sump decreases).=20 Don't know where this comes from? My sump is only 1 gallon and contains = two fuel pumps. Never had an issue with fuel return to the sump in 520 hours now. I had a minor problem at one time with sump vent placement. Had a potential major problem once when I had the sump vent temporarily plugged - BIG = NO-NO! Perry =20 This is a perfect example of why it's going to be virtually impossible = to come up with a list of practices that we "know" will, or won't work. =20 =20 Rusty (yes Al, we WILL talk about you while you're gone ) ------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C562B5.B10EB1A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

>There are several down sides to returning fuel to = the sump=20 (aggrivated
>quite a bit as the size of the sump=20 decreases). 

Don't know where this comes from? My sump is = only 1=20 gallon and contains two
fuel pumps. Never had an issue with fuel = return to=20 the sump in 520 hours now. I had a minor problem at one time with sump = vent=20 placement. Had a potential
major problem once when I had the sump = vent=20 temporarily plugged - BIG NO-NO!

Perry

 
This = is a perfect=20 example of why it's going to be virtually impossible to come up with a = list of=20 practices that we "know" will, or won't work. 
 
Rusty = (yes Al,=20 we WILL talk about you while you're gone <g>)


 ------=_NextPart_000_0056_01C562B5.B10EB1A0--