X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail10.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.191] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2) with ESMTPS id 965025 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 27 May 2005 02:07:03 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.191; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-99-217.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.99.217]) by mail10.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j4R669ci023027 for ; Fri, 27 May 2005 16:06:12 +1000 Message-ID: <004601c56282$dc4de490$d9631fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:11:00 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0043_01C562D6.AC47FED0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C562D6.AC47FED0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pimps? My plan was to have 2 pimps in the sump tank with fuel return = to the sump tank. Iplan ning to run the engine on the test stand with a = duplicate of the A/C fuel system. Any input? Georges B. -------Original Message------- From: Rotary motors in aircraft Date: 05/26/05 10:30:58 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port Having the pump in a 'sump tank' is a completely different = scenario than pump in main tank. Don't do this thinking that it is a = tried & true solution. Might be OK if all other factors are considered = but there are a LOT of them. Tracy (still hate sump/header tanks) ----- Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port This would not prevent a return system from being developed and=20 installed. Unless you intend to put an RX 8 pump inside your = sump=20 tank...it might not be a bad idea to plan for one. =20 Speaking of.. Anyone actually DOING in-tank fuel pumps. As = popular as PL=20 is around here, I gleaned from his list that having an in tank = pump can=20 help prevent vaporlock by not having to "SUCK" fuel. As long as = the tank=20 remains wet (or the fuel air mix too rich) it should be safe.. = right? Something to consider... Dave =20 =20 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.15 - Release Date: 5/22/2005 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C562D6.AC47FED0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Pimps?
 My plan was to have 2 pimps in the sump tank with = fuel return=20 to the sump tank. Iplan ning to run the engine on the test stand = with a=20 duplicate of the A/C fuel system. Any input?
Georges B.
 
 
-------Original=20 Message-------
 
From: Rotary motors in=20 aircraft
Date: = 05/26/05=20 10:30:58
To: Rotary motors in=20 aircraft
Subject: = [FlyRotary]=20 Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port
 
Having the pump in a 'sump tank'  is a completely = different=20 scenario than pump in main tank.  Don't do this thinking = that it is=20 a tried & true solution.  Might be OK if all other = factors are=20 considered but there are a LOT of them.
 
Tracy (still hate sump/header tanks)
----- Subject: = [FlyRotary] Re: No=20 fuel return for RX-8 six port

This would not prevent a return system from being = developed and
installed. Unless you intend to put an RX 8 = pump=20 inside your sump
tank...it might not be a bad idea to plan = for=20 one.
 
Speaking of.. Anyone actually DOING in-tank = fuel=20 pumps. As popular as PL
is around here, I gleaned from his = list that=20 having an in tank pump can
help prevent vaporlock by not = having to=20 "SUCK" fuel. As long as the tank
remains wet (or the fuel = air mix=20 too rich) it should be safe.. right?

Something to=20 consider...

Dave

 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG=20 Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.15 - Release = Date:=20 5/22/2005

>>  Homepage: =20 http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>  Archive:  =20 = http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C562D6.AC47FED0--