X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.220] (HELO priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.2) with ESMTP id 964848 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 May 2005 22:00:41 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.185.220.220; envelope-from=echolakeresort@telus.net Received: from boucher-oddle24 ([207.194.127.19]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050527015955.PWHB29304.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@boucher-oddle24> for ; Thu, 26 May 2005 19:59:55 -0600 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.322 [266.11.15]); Thu, 26 May 2005 18:59:52 -0700 Message-Id: <42967F14.000009.02676@BOUCHER-ODDLE24> Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 18:59:48 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time) X-Mailer: IncrediMail (3001609) From: "Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" References: To: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-42967F181B06=======" --=======AVGMAIL-42967F181B06======= Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_OJL4MY50000000000000" --------------Boundary-00=_OJL4MY50000000000000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I deserve that!! I guess that's what Ed calls a "senior moment".=0D Georges B. =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Date: 05/26/05 18:55:38=0D To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port=0D =0D Hi Georges,=0D =0D I don't even want to know what your're going to pimp in the sump. :)=0D =0D Sorry,=0D Bob W.=0D =0D =0D On Thu, 26 May 2005 18:48:42 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time)=0D "Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" =0D wrote:=0D =0D > My plan was to have 2 pimps in the sump tank with fuel return to the s= ump=0D > tank. Iplan ning to run the engine on the test stand with a duplicate o= f the=0D > A/C fuel system. Any input?=0D > Georges B.=0D >=0D >=0D > -------Original Message-------=0D >=0D > From: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D > Date: 05/26/05 10:30:58=0D > To: Rotary motors in aircraft=0D > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port=0D >=0D > Having the pump in a 'sump tank' is a completely different scenario th= an=0D > pump in main tank. Don't do this thinking that it is a tried & true=0D > solution. Might be OK if all other factors are considered but there ar= e a=0D > LOT of them.=0D >=0D > Tracy (still hate sump/header tanks)=0D > ----- Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port=0D >=0D >=0D > This would not prevent a return system from being developed and=0D > installed. Unless you intend to put an RX 8 pump inside your sump=0D > tank...it might not be a bad idea to plan for one.=0D >=0D > Speaking of.. Anyone actually DOING in-tank fuel pumps. As popular as P= L=0D > is around here, I gleaned from his list that having an in tank pump can= =0D > help prevent vaporlock by not having to "SUCK" fuel. As long as the tan= k=0D > remains wet (or the fuel air mix too rich) it should be safe.. right?=0D >=0D > Something to consider...=0D >=0D > Dave=0D >=0D >=0D >=0D =0D =0D --=0D http://www.bob-white.com=0D N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)=0D =0D >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=0D >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html=0D =0D =0D --=0D No virus found in this incoming message.=0D Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.=0D Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.15 - Release Date: 5/22/2005=0D =0D =2E --------------Boundary-00=_OJL4MY50000000000000 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I deserve that!! I guess that's what Ed calls a "senior moment".
Georges B. 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 05/26/05 18:= 55:38
Subject: [FlyRotar= y] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port
 
Hi Georges,
 
I don't even want to know what your're going to pimp in the sump. :)=
 
Sorry,
Bob W.
 
 
On Thu, 26 May 2005 18:48:42 -0700 (Pacific Standard Time)
"Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)" <echolakeresort@telus.net>
wrote:
 
>  My plan was to have 2 pimps in the sump tank with fu= el return to the sump
> tank. Iplan ning to run the engine on the test stand with a dup= licate of the
> A/C fuel system. Any input?
> Georges B.
>
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Date: 05/26/05 10:30:58
> To: Rotary motors in aircraft
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port
>
> Having the pump in a 'sump tank'  is a completely dif= ferent scenario than
> pump in main tank.  Don't do this thinking that it is= a tried & true
> solution.  Might be OK if all other factors are consi= dered but there are a
> LOT of them.
>
> Tracy (still hate sump/header tanks)
> ----- Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: No fuel return for RX-8 six port=
>
>
> This would not prevent a return system from being developed and=
> installed. Unless you intend to put an RX 8 pump inside your su= mp
> tank...it might not be a bad idea to plan for one.
>
> Speaking of.. Anyone actually DOING in-tank fuel pumps. As popu= lar as PL
> is around here, I gleaned from his list that having an in tank = pump can
> help prevent vaporlock by not having to "SUCK" fuel. As long as= the tank
> remains wet (or the fuel air mix too rich) it should be safe.. = right?
>
> Something to consider...
>
> Dave
>
>
>
 
 
--
http://www.bob-white.com
N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (real soon)
 
>>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
 
 
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.15 - Release Date: 5/22/20= 05
 
.
--------------Boundary-00=_OJL4MY50000000000000-- --=======AVGMAIL-42967F181B06======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 266.11.15 - Release Date: 5/22/2005 --=======AVGMAIL-42967F181B06=======--