Return-Path: Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net ([151.164.30.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1) with ESMTP id 2500834 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:50:14 -0400 Received: from locb1 (adsl-208-191-163-70.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net [208.191.163.70]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with SMTP id h6MFo9vh007434 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:50:09 -0500 (CDT) From: "Christopher Barber" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Picture update on my site.....yeah, finally Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:55:34 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 John, Thanks for the feedback. I am still in the investigation phase. I have already installed the top NACA per plans (this was done before I chose the right path of flying rotary). My thoughts at the moment are to install identical NACA's on the bottom with the "heat exchange/radiator. Then I can use the top NACA's for additional needs. I know Paul disfavors NACA's...but my top ones were installed before I found this list and I tend to stick mostly to the plans (of course that statement ignores belly NACA's and AUTO CONVERSION ). Hopefully with all 4 scoops, I will have choices as to the best arrangement. At this stage all ideas, especially better ones, are greatly appreciated. Do the armpit scoops prove to be more efficient versus drag? It seems I remember a lot of griping about them when I reviewed the Reflector archives. All the best. Chris Christopher Barber Attorney and Counselor at Law 11930 S Sam Houston Pkwy E Suite 103 Houston, Texas 77089-4755 281-464-LAWS (5297) 281-754-4168 (Fax) "Serving the needs of Senior Texans" CBarber@TexasAttorney.net www.TexasAttorney.net -----Original Message----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of John Overman Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:36 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Picture update on my site.....yeah, finally --- CBarber wrote: > For those of you that like to follow this sort of > thing, like I do, in > addition to the new pictures I posted yesterday, I > have added new shots to > my builders web page today as well. > > These new pix include the 'ol core 13b I bought to > learn/play with mounted > on my Velocity SE. FWIW. > > All the best, > > Chris > www.LoneStarVelocity.com > Houston > Chris I realize you are planning to put your rad under the engine. So was I, but after I mounted the engine there wasn't as much room under it as I had hoped. I felt it would be difficult to mount a rad plus feed the oil cooler plus the inter cooler from below. So I used the top NACA scoops. Not the factory diminsions as they are not true to the formula. I plotted the curves and cut two scoops on the top. Each one goes directly into a triangular fiberglass plenum upon which is hung a GM airconditioner evaporator core into which I had welded two #12 AN bungs. I'm using one armpit scoop tho feed the intercooler and the other to feed the oil cooler. I'm still fabricating but it looks like it will work out great with not too much drag. Just one more way to do it. John __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html