Return-Path: Received: from web41105.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9) with SMTP id 2476163 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 16:54:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20030715205444.48383.qmail@web41105.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.119.33.170] by web41105.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:54:44 PDT Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:54:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Caleb Ramsby Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Failure Report from Chuck Dunlap To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii So if one were using a supercharger instead of a turbocharger that it would still be putting out the same amount of an intake charge. I wonder how much would go through the unoperated rotor and how much would go through the running rotor. There could be a chance of a drastic overboost with a rotor going on a supercharged engine. What do you guys think? Caleb Ramsby __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com