Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.169.62] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9) with ESMTP id 2475156 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:57:53 -0400 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:57:38 -0700 Received: from 67.243.12.110 by bay3-dav32.bay3.hotmail.com with DAV; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:57:37 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [67.243.12.110] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] Reply-To: "Tracy Crook" From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd and 3rd run logs Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:59:01 -0400 Organization: Real World Solutions Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0106_01C34A42.5ED32A20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2003 23:57:38.0163 (UTC) FILETIME=[B42DE430:01C34A63] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0106_01C34A42.5ED32A20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry guys, have had very little time to get on-line here. I can't = think of a good reason to run all 4 injectors at low throttle. What = would be the advantage? =20 No, the engine should not die when disabling the primary injectors, even = at low throttle. The computer is perfectly capable of figuring this = stuff out and doing the right thing (assuming everything is hooked up = correctly) and the engine is in a reasonable state of tune. It is = possible that having the secondary injectors at the far end of the = intake runners will cause some anomolies. =20 Tracy (who sometimes regrets that he ever mentioned the EM2 before it = was completely done : ) ----- Original Message -----=20 From: John Slade=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:35 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd and 3rd run logs > I might just be tempted to try running all four full time. =20 I'd be interested to hear Tracy's thoughts on this... if he's = listening in between packing up EM2s for shipment. John Slade ------=_NextPart_000_0106_01C34A42.5ED32A20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry guys, have had very little = time to get=20 on-line here. I can't think of a good reason to run all 4 = injectors at low=20 throttle. What would be the advantage?

No, the engine should not die when = disabling the=20 primary injectors, even at low throttle. The computer is perfectly = capable=20 of figuring this stuff out and doing the right thing (assuming = everything is=20 hooked up correctly) and the engine is in a reasonable state of = tune. It=20 is possible that having the secondary injectors at the far end of the = intake=20 runners will cause some anomolies.

Tracy (who sometimes regrets that he = ever mentioned=20 the EM2 before it was completely done : )

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John=20 Slade
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft

Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 = 8:35 AM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 2nd = and 3rd run=20 logs

> I might=20 just be tempted to try running all four full time.

I'd be interested to hear Tracy's thoughts = on this...=20 if he's listening in between packing up EM2s for=20 shipment.

John=20 Slade

------=_NextPart_000_0106_01C34A42.5ED32A20--