Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
Received: from [205.152.59.71] (HELO imf23aec.bellsouth.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9)
  with ESMTP id 2474112 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:34:36 -0400
Received: from rad ([68.212.0.192]) by imf23aec.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with ESMTP
          id <20030714043435.LVSD29322.imf23aec.bellsouth.net@rad>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:34:35 -0400
From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net>
To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Failure Report from Chuck Dunlap
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 23:34:37 -0500
Message-ID: <000301c349c1$3c14fcb0$0201a8c0@rad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-2474085@logan.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

> So even though the single rotor was not able to maintain
> flight, you might consider that it kept him airborn long enough for =
other
> alternatives.

Interesting. Perhaps thats another argument for a turbo...
----

=3D=3D=3D> My thoughts exactly, especially if you find a way to make the =
max boost
adjustable, so you can use "emergency" boost if needed. =20

Rusty