Return-Path: <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
Received: from [205.152.59.66] (HELO imf18aec.bellsouth.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9)
  with ESMTP id 2474082 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 23:55:33 -0400
Received: from TOSHIBAjhr ([209.215.55.52]) by imf18aec.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.27 201-253-122-126-127-20021220) with SMTP
          id <20030714035531.MEPX28413.imf18aec.bellsouth.net@TOSHIBAjhr>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Sun, 13 Jul 2003 23:55:31 -0400
From: "John Slade" <sladerj@bellsouth.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Engine Failure Report from Chuck Dunlap
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 23:55:30 -0400
Message-ID: <NMELKLCBIAJLEHHCHLJBMEBFCGAA.sladerj@bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <list-2473844@logan.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

> I can maintain level flight in the pattern with 3200 rpm, but that is near
> sea level (1600 MSL)  which is of course not the same conditions
> that Chuck was faced with.  So even though the single rotor was not able
to maintain
> flight, you might consider that it kept him airborn long enough for other
> alternatives.
Interesting. Perhaps thats another argument for a turbo...