Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com ([24.93.67.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b8) with ESMTP id 2460092 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jul 2003 05:51:18 -0400 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-221.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.221]) by ms-smtp-01.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id h699ispN026345 for ; Wed, 9 Jul 2003 05:44:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001101c345ff$a59e5520$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: O2 Sensor Life with Lead Gasoline Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 05:51:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Hi Ernest, Based on what I have experienced and others, I would hazard an opinion that only occassionaly use of 100LL would certainly extend the life of the sensor. Ed Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: O2 Sensor Life with Lead Gasoline > Ed Anderson wrote: > > For those of you interested, I just replaced my O2 sensor after 114hours of > > using 100LL gasoline. It lasted 114 hours of engine run time, however, the > > Would it be expected to last longer if 100LL is only used part of the > time? Say for instance, only when it's not possible to obtain auto gas? > > -- > ----Because I can---- > http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ > ------------------------ > > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html